Barofsky Jeremy, Spring Hannah, Gartoulla Pragya, Shrestha Raman, Sapkota Sabitri, McElwee Elizabeth, Church Kathryn, Datta Saugato, Livingston Karina
ideas42, Madison, WI, USA.
ideas42, Seattle, WA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):1903. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19150-0.
Although long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is more effective and longer lasting than short-acting methods, uptake remains low among post-abortion clients. Using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, we evaluate the impact of a provider-level peer-comparison intervention to encourage choice of LARC in Nepal among post-abortion clients.
The intervention used prominently displayed monthly posters comparing the health clinic's previous month performance on LARC uptake against peer clinics. To understand how the intervention affected behavior, while ensuring voluntarism and informed choice, we used mystery client visits, in-depth provider interviews, and client exit survey data. The trial examined 17,680 post-abortion clients in 36 clinics in Nepal from July 2016 to January 2017. The primary outcome was the proportion of clients receiving LARCs. Statistical analysis used ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with ANCOVA estimation to assess the intervention's impact on LARC uptake while controlling for client- and clinic-level characteristics.
The intervention increased LARC use among post-abortion clients by 6.6% points [95% CI: 0.85 to 12.3, p-value < 0.05], a 29.5% increase in LARC use compared to control clinics. This effect persisted after the formal experiment ended. Analysis of provider and client experiences showed that the behavioral intervention generated significant change in providers' counseling practices, motivated the sharing of best practices. Quality of care indicators either remained stable or improved.
We find that a provider-level behavioral intervention increases LARC uptake among post-abortion clients. This type of intervention represents a low-cost option to contribute to reducing unmet need for contraception through provider behavior change.
尽管长效可逆避孕法(LARC)比短效避孕法更有效且持续时间更长,但人工流产后的女性对其采用率仍然很低。我们采用阶梯式整群随机试验,评估在尼泊尔针对人工流产后的女性开展的一项提供者层面的同行比较干预措施对鼓励其选择LARC的影响。
该干预措施使用每月显著展示的海报,将该健康诊所前一个月LARC采用情况与同行诊所进行比较。为了解该干预措施如何影响行为,同时确保自愿性和充分知情选择,我们采用了神秘顾客访问、对提供者的深入访谈以及顾客出院调查数据。该试验在2016年7月至2017年1月期间对尼泊尔36家诊所的17,680名人工流产后的女性进行了研究。主要结局是接受LARC的女性比例。统计分析采用普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归及协方差分析估计,以评估干预措施对LARC采用情况的影响,同时控制顾客和诊所层面的特征。
该干预措施使人工流产后的女性中LARC的使用增加了6.6个百分点[95%置信区间:0.85至12.3,p值<0.05],与对照诊所相比,LARC的使用增加了29.5%。在正式试验结束后,这种效果仍然存在。对提供者和顾客经历的分析表明,行为干预使提供者的咨询做法发生了显著变化,促进了最佳实践的分享。护理质量指标要么保持稳定,要么有所改善。
我们发现,提供者层面的行为干预可提高人工流产后的女性对LARC的采用率。这种类型的干预是一种低成本的选择,可通过改变提供者的行为来减少未满足的避孕需求。