Deleris Robin, Bureau Côme, Lebbah Saïd, Decavèle Maxens, Dres Martin, Mayaux Julien, Similowski Thomas, Dechartres Agnès, Demoule Alexandre
AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation (Département R3S), F-75013, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005, Paris, France.
Respir Res. 2024 Jul 16;25(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02867-2.
Morphine relieves dyspnea in various clinical circumstances. Whether or not this applies to patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose morphine on dyspnea in patients admitted to the ICU for ARF.
In this single-center, double-blind, phase 2, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned non-intubated adults admitted to the ICU for ARF with severe dyspnea, defined by a visual analog scale for dyspnea (dyspnea-VAS) from zero (no dyspnea) to 100 mm (worst imaginable dyspnea) ≥40 mm, to receive a low dose of Morphine Hydrochloride (intravenous titration followed by subcutaneous relay) or Placebo. All patients received standard therapy, including etiological treatment and non-invasive respiratory support.
Twenty-two patients were randomized, 11 in each group. The average dyspnea (median [interquartile range]) over 24 hours did not significantly differ between the two groups (40 [25 - 43] mm in the Morphine group vs. 40 [36 - 49] mm in the Placebo group, p=0.411). Dyspnea-VAS was lower in the Morphine group than in the Placebo group at the end of intravenous titration (30 [11 - 30] vs. 35 [30 - 44], p=0.044) and four hours later (18 [10 - 29] vs. 50 [30 - 60], p=0.043). The cumulative probability of intubation was higher in the Morphine group than in the Placebo group (p=0.046) CONCLUSION: In this phase 2 pilot trial, morphine did not improve 24-hour average dyspnea in adult patients with ARF, even though it had a statistically significant immediate effect. Of concern, Morphine use was associated with a higher intubation rate.
The protocol was declared on the ClinicalTrial.gov database (no. NCT04358133) and was published in September 2022.
吗啡可缓解多种临床情况下的呼吸困难。但这是否适用于因急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者尚不清楚。我们评估了小剂量吗啡对因ARF入住ICU患者呼吸困难的疗效和安全性。
在这项单中心、双盲、2期、随机对照试验中,我们将因ARF入住ICU且有严重呼吸困难的非插管成年患者(呼吸困难用视觉模拟量表[VAS]定义,范围从零[无呼吸困难]到100毫米[可想象到的最严重呼吸困难]≥40毫米)随机分组,分别接受小剂量盐酸吗啡(静脉滴定后皮下维持)或安慰剂治疗。所有患者均接受标准治疗,包括病因治疗和无创呼吸支持。
22例患者被随机分组,每组11例。两组24小时内的平均呼吸困难程度(中位数[四分位间距])无显著差异(吗啡组为40[25 - 43]毫米,安慰剂组为40[36 - 49]毫米,p = 0.411)。在静脉滴定结束时(30[11 - 30]对35[30 - 44],p = 0.044)和4小时后(18[10 - 29]对50[30 - 60],p = 0.043),吗啡组的呼吸困难VAS低于安慰剂组。吗啡组的插管累积概率高于安慰剂组(p = 0.046)。结论:在这项2期试点试验中,吗啡并未改善成年ARF患者的24小时平均呼吸困难程度,尽管其具有统计学上显著的即时效果。值得关注的是,使用吗啡与更高的插管率相关。
该方案已在ClinicalTrial.gov数据库(编号NCT04358133)上公布,并于2022年9月发表。