Royal Kenneth D, Meyer Christian, Guercio Erik, Speicher Mark, Flamini Joseph, Sandella Jeanne M, Tsai Tsung-Hsun, Searcy Cynthia A
Director of MCAT Research and Data Science, 8352 Association of American Medical Colleges , Washington, DC, USA.
Psychometric Intern, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, USA.
J Osteopath Med. 2024 Jul 18;125(1):9-18. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0265. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
Osteopathic (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO]) medical students account for more than 25 % of all medical students in the United States.
This study examined the predictive validity of Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) total scores and cumulative undergraduate grade point averages (UGPAs) for performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 and Level 2-CE (Cognitive Evaluation) licensure examinations administered by the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME). Additionally, the study examined the degree to which MCAT total scores and UGPAs provide comparable prediction of student performance by key sociodemographic variables.
This study involved a collaborative effort between the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) and the NBOME. Data were examined for 39 accredited DO-granting medical schools in the United States during the 2017 application cycle. Researchers utilized three regression models that included MCAT total scores, cumulative UGPA, and combined MCAT total scores and cumulative UGPA to determine predictive validity. Researchers also examined the comparability of prediction for sociodemographic variables by examining the differences between observed and predicted error for both scores and pass/fail success rates.
Medium to large correlations were discernible between MCAT total scores, UGPA, and COMLEX-USA examination outcomes. For both COMLEX-USA Level 1 and Level 2-CE scores and pass/fail outcomes, MCAT scores alone provided superior predictive value to UGPA alone. However, MCAT scores and UGPA utilized in conjunction provided the best predictive value. When predicting both licensure examination scores and pass/fail outcomes by sociodemographic variables, all three models provided comparable predictive accuracy.
Findings from this comprehensive study of DO-granting medical schools provide evidence for the value-added benefit of taking MCAT scores and UGPA into consideration, particularly when these measures are utilized in conjunction. Further, findings provide evidence indicating that individuals from different sociodemographic backgrounds who enter medical school with similar MCAT scores and UGPA perform similarly on licensure examination outcome measures.
整骨医学博士(DO)医学生占美国所有医学生的25%以上。
本研究考察了医学院入学考试(MCAT)总分和本科累积平均绩点(UGPA)对美国国家整骨医学考试委员会(NBOME)举办的美国整骨医学综合执照考试(COMLEX-USA)一级和二级认知评估(CE)执照考试成绩的预测效度。此外,该研究还考察了MCAT总分和UGPA在多大程度上能按关键社会人口统计学变量对学生成绩提供可比的预测。
本研究是美国医学院协会(AAMC)、美国整骨医学院协会(AACOM)和NBOME之间的合作成果。对2017年申请周期内美国39所获得认证的授予DO学位的医学院的数据进行了分析。研究人员使用了三个回归模型,包括MCAT总分、累积UGPA以及MCAT总分与累积UGPA的组合,以确定预测效度。研究人员还通过检查分数和通过/未通过成功率的观察误差与预测误差之间的差异,考察了社会人口统计学变量预测的可比性。
MCAT总分、UGPA与COMLEX-USA考试结果之间存在中等到较大的相关性。对于COMLEX-USA一级和二级CE分数以及通过/未通过结果,单独的MCAT分数比单独的UGPA具有更高的预测价值。然而,MCAT分数和UGPA结合使用时提供了最佳预测价值。当按社会人口统计学变量预测执照考试分数和通过/未通过结果时,所有三个模型都提供了可比的预测准确性。
这项对授予DO学位的医学院的全面研究结果为考虑MCAT分数和UGPA的增值效益提供了证据,特别是当这些指标结合使用时。此外,研究结果提供的证据表明,具有相似MCAT分数和UGPA进入医学院的不同社会人口统计学背景的个体在执照考试结果指标上表现相似。