Suppr超能文献

议程设定工具包在2型糖尿病患者护理中的可行性和可接受性:QBSAFE ASK可行性研究

Feasibility and Acceptability of an Agenda-Setting Kit in the Care of People With Type 2 Diabetes: The QBSAFE ASK Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Haider Shanzay, Gonzalez-Lopez Carolina, Clark Jennifer, Gravholt Derek L, Breslin Maggie, Boehmer Kasey R, Hartasanchez Sandra A, Sanchez Brianna, Montori Victor M, Lipska Kasia J

机构信息

Section of Endocrinology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Clin Diabetes. 2024 Summer;42(3):358-363. doi: 10.2337/cd23-0062. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

Abstract

This article reports on a study to assess the feasibility of research procedures and acceptability of QBSAFE, a set of conversation cards focused on quality of life, treatment burden, safety, and avoidance of future events in people with type 2 diabetes. The study enrolled 84 patients and 7 clinicians. Of the 58 patients who completed questionnaires, 64% agreed that the QBSAFE agenda-setting kit (ASK) helped them discuss their situation, 78% agreed that others could benefit from it, and 38% said they would use it again. Most clinicians felt confident responding to issues (in 89% of encounters) and said they would use the kit again (78%) and recommend it to colleagues (82%). The QBSAFE ASK can be feasibly implemented and holds promise in facilitating discussion and collaborative problem-solving.

摘要

本文报道了一项研究,旨在评估研究程序的可行性以及QBSAFE(一套关注2型糖尿病患者生活质量、治疗负担、安全性和预防未来事件的对话卡片)的可接受性。该研究招募了84名患者和7名临床医生。在完成问卷的58名患者中,64%的人认为QBSAFE议程设定工具包(ASK)有助于他们讨论自身情况,78%的人认为其他人可以从中受益,38%的人表示会再次使用它。大多数临床医生对回应问题感到自信(在89%的诊疗中),并表示会再次使用该工具包(78%),还会向同事推荐(82%)。QBSAFE ASK可以切实可行地实施,并有望促进讨论和协作解决问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ae/11247036/06e1c297c6c8/diaclincd230062f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验