Jiang Ji-Hong, Zhao Chang-Ming, Zhang Jun, Xu Rong-Ming, Chen Lei
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhejiang University Mingzhou Hospital, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China.
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 16;12(20):4108-4120. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4108.
The pedicle screw technique is widely employed for vertebral body fixation in the treatment of spinal disorders. However, traditional screw placement methods require the dissection of paraspinal muscles and the insertion of pedicle screws at specific transverse section angles (TSA). Larger TSA angles require more force to pull the muscle tissue, which can increase the risk of surgical trauma and ischemic injury to the lumbar muscles.
To study the feasibility of zero-degree TSA vertical pedicle screw technique in the lumbosacral segment.
Finite element models of vertebral bodies and pedicle screw-rod systems were established for the L4-S1 spinal segments. A standard axial load of 500 N and a rotational torque of 10 N/m were applied. Simulated screw pull-out experiment was conducted to observe pedicle screw resistance to pull-out, maximum stress, load-displacement ratio, maximum stress in vertebral bodies, load-displacement ratio in vertebral bodies, and the stress distribution in pedicle screws and vertebral bodies. Differences between the 0-degree and 17-degree TSA were compared.
At 0-degree TSA, the screw pull-out force decreased by 11.35% compared to that at 17-degree TSA ( < 0.05). At 0-degree and 17-degree TSA, the stress range in the screw-rod system was 335.1-657.5 MPa and 242.8-648.5 MPa, separately, which were below the fracture threshold for the screw-rod system (924 MPa). At 0-degree and 17-degree TSA, the stress range in the vertebral bodies was 68.45-78.91 MPa and 39.08-72.73 MPa, separately, which were below the typical bone yield stress range for vertebral bodies (110-125 MPa). At 0-degree TSA, the load-displacement ratio for the vertebral bodies and pedicle screws was slightly lower compared to that at 17-degree TSA, indicating slightly lower stability ( < 0.05).
The safety and stability of 0-degree TSA are slightly lower, but the risks of screw-rod system fracture, vertebral body fracture, and rupture are within acceptable limits.
椎弓根螺钉技术广泛应用于脊柱疾病治疗中的椎体固定。然而,传统的螺钉置入方法需要剥离椎旁肌肉,并以特定的横截面积角度(TSA)插入椎弓根螺钉。较大的TSA角度需要更大的力来牵拉肌肉组织,这会增加手术创伤和腰部肌肉缺血性损伤的风险。
研究零角度TSA垂直椎弓根螺钉技术在腰骶段的可行性。
建立L4-S1脊柱节段的椎体和椎弓根螺钉-棒系统的有限元模型。施加500 N的标准轴向载荷和10 N/m的旋转扭矩。进行模拟螺钉拔出实验,观察椎弓根螺钉的抗拔出力、最大应力、载荷-位移比、椎体中的最大应力、椎体中的载荷-位移比以及椎弓根螺钉和椎体中的应力分布。比较0度和17度TSA之间的差异。
在0度TSA时,螺钉拔出力比17度TSA时降低了11.35%(P<0.05)。在0度和17度TSA时,螺钉-棒系统中的应力范围分别为335.1-657.5 MPa和242.8-648.5 MPa,均低于螺钉-棒系统的断裂阈值(924 MPa)。在0度和17度TSA时,椎体中的应力范围分别为68.45-78.91 MPa和39.08-72.73 MPa,均低于椎体的典型骨屈服应力范围(110-125 MPa)。在0度TSA时,椎体和椎弓根螺钉的载荷-位移比略低于17度TSA时,表明稳定性略低(P<0.05)。
0度TSA的安全性和稳定性略低,但螺钉-棒系统骨折、椎体骨折和破裂的风险在可接受范围内。