Liu Yong-Tao, Liu Xiao-Xin, Liu Yi-Qing, Zhang Lei, Zhang Lin-Jing, Wang Jian-Hua, Shi Yan, Xie Qing-Fan
Department of Rehabilitation, Xingtai People's Hospital, Xingtai 054001, Hebei Province, China.
Ophthalmologist Clinic, Xingtai People's Hospital, Xingtai 054001, Hebei Province, China.
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jul 16;12(20):4289-4300. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4289.
Stroke often results in significant respiratory dysfunction in patients. Respiratory muscle training (RMT) has been proposed as a rehabilitative intervention to address these challenges, but its effectiveness compared to routine training remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effects of RMT on exercise tolerance, muscle strength, and pulmonary function in post-stroke patients.
To systematically assess the efficacy of RMT in improving exercise tolerance, respiratory muscle strength, and pulmonary function in patients recovering from a stroke, and to evaluate whether RMT offers a significant advantage over routine training modalities in enhancing these critical health outcomes in the post-stroke population.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted on October 19, 2023, without temporal restrictions. Studies were selected based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria focusing on various forms of RMT, control groups, and outcome measures [including forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and 6-min walking test (6MWT)]. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Statistical analyses, including those using the fixed-effect and random-effects models, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment, were performed using Review Manager software.
A total of 15 RCTs were included. Results indicated significant improvements in MIP (12.51 cmHO increase), MEP (6.24 cmHO increase), and various pulmonary function parameters (including FEV1, FVC, MVV, and PEF). A substantial increase in 6MWT distance (22.26 meters) was also noted. However, the heterogeneity among studies was variable, and no significant publication bias was detected.
RMT significantly enhances walking ability, respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP), and key pulmonary function parameters (FEV1, FVC, MVV, and PEF) in post-stroke patients. These findings support the incorporation of RMT into post-stroke rehabilitative protocols.
中风常常导致患者出现严重的呼吸功能障碍。呼吸肌训练(RMT)已被提议作为一种康复干预措施来应对这些挑战,但其与常规训练相比的有效性仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估RMT对中风后患者运动耐量、肌肉力量和肺功能的影响。
系统评估RMT对中风康复患者运动耐量、呼吸肌力量和肺功能改善的疗效,并评估RMT在改善中风后人群这些关键健康结局方面是否比常规训练方式具有显著优势。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,于2023年10月19日对PubMed、Embase、科学网和考克兰图书馆进行了全面检索,无时间限制。根据预定义的纳入和排除标准选择研究,重点关注各种形式的RMT、对照组和结局指标[包括第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、最大自主通气量(MVV)、呼气峰值流速(PEF)、最大吸气压力(MIP)、最大呼气压力(MEP)和6分钟步行试验(6MWT)]。仅纳入随机对照试验(RCT)。两名评价者使用考克兰协作网的偏倚风险工具独立进行数据提取和质量评估。使用Review Manager软件进行统计分析,包括固定效应和随机效应模型分析、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估。
共纳入15项RCT。结果表明MIP(增加12.51cmH₂O)、MEP(增加6.24cmH₂O)以及各种肺功能参数(包括FEV1、FVC、MVV和PEF)有显著改善。6MWT距离也有大幅增加(22.26米)。然而,各研究之间的异质性各不相同,未检测到显著的发表偏倚。
RMT可显著提高中风后患者的步行能力、呼吸肌力量(MIP和MEP)以及关键肺功能参数(FEV1、FVC、MVV和PEF)。这些发现支持将RMT纳入中风后康复方案。