Suppr超能文献

静息和思维任务状态下 EEG 无周期成分的测试-重测信度。

Test-Retest Reliability of EEG Aperiodic Components in Resting and Mental Task States.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of the Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.

出版信息

Brain Topogr. 2024 Nov;37(6):961-971. doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01067-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

Abstract

Aperiodic activity is derived from the electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum and reflects changes in the slope and shifts of the broadband spectrum. Studies have shown inconsistent test-retest reliability of the aperiodic components. This study systematically measured how the test-retest reliability of the aperiodic components was affected by data duration (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min), states (resting with eyes closed, resting with eyes open, performing mental arithmetic, recalling the events of the day, and mentally singing songs), and methods (the Fitting Oscillations and One-Over-F (FOOOF) and Linear Mixed-Effects Regression (LMER)) at both short (90-min) and long (one-month) intervals. The results showed that aperiodic components had fair, good, or excellent test-retest reliability (ranging from 0.53 to 0.91) at both short and long intervals. It is recommended that better reliability of the aperiodic components be obtained using data durations longer than 3 min, the resting state with eyes closed, the mental arithmetic task state, and the LMER method.

摘要

周期性活动源自脑电图 (EEG) 功率谱,反映了宽带谱斜率和偏移的变化。研究表明,周期性成分的测试-重测信度不一致。本研究系统地测量了周期性成分的测试-重测信度如何受到数据持续时间(1、2、3、4 和 5 分钟)、状态(闭眼休息、睁眼休息、心算、回忆当天的事件、唱歌)和方法(拟合震荡和一除 F(FOOOF)和线性混合效应回归(LMER))的影响,分别在短(90 分钟)和长(一个月)间隔内。结果表明,周期性成分在短时间和长时间间隔内均具有良好、中等或优秀的测试-重测信度(范围为 0.53 至 0.91)。建议使用超过 3 分钟的数据持续时间、闭眼休息状态、心算任务状态和 LMER 方法获得更好的周期性成分可靠性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验