• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国三级新生儿重症监护病房中早产儿的微创表面活性剂给药:一项调查

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants in Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Germany: A Survey.

作者信息

Maiwald Christian A, Franz Axel R, Poets Christian F, Springer Laila

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Center for Pediatric Clinical Studies (CPCS), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Neonatology. 2025;122(1):46-55. doi: 10.1159/000539302. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1159/000539302
PMID:39019018
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The European guideline for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome recommends less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) as the preferred method of surfactant administration in spontaneously breathing preterm infants. However, there is limited evidence on practical aspects such as sedation and catheter types, leading to considerable variability between centers.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey (www.soscisurvey.de) was sent to 164 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Germany including 43 questions on practical aspects of LISA.

RESULTS

Of 122 (74%) participating NICUs, 117 (96%) reported experience with LISA with 82% of those reporting LISA as their preferred method of surfactant administration. Indications for surfactant administration differed widely between NICUs. Most (89%) used FiO2-thresholds only or in combination with other criteria, such as Silverman score/signs of dyspnea (41%) or lung ultrasound findings (3%). Prophylactic surfactant was administered by 42%. Differences in use of LISA in extremely immature infants were reported (e.g., 36% did not perform LISA in infants below 24-26 weeks). Preferred drugs for sedation were (Es-)Ketamine, followed by Propofol and Midazolam. Minimum time interval between subsequent LISA procedures was 4 (2-6) h. Catheters specifically designed for LISA were used by most NICUs (69%).

CONCLUSION

This survey shows that LISA is common practice in German NICUs, but with considerable variability in practical aspects. These data may serve as a guidance for NICUs that have not yet implemented LISA and might be helpful design clinical trials with the aim to standardize and/or optimize LISA.

摘要

引言

欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征治疗指南推荐在自主呼吸的早产儿中,采用微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)作为表面活性剂给药的首选方法。然而,关于镇静和导管类型等实际操作方面的证据有限,导致各中心之间存在相当大的差异。

方法

向德国164家三级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)发送了一项匿名在线调查(www.soscisurvey.de),其中包括43个关于LISA实际操作方面的问题。

结果

在122家(74%)参与调查的NICU中,117家(96%)报告有LISA经验,其中82%将LISA作为表面活性剂给药的首选方法。各NICU在表面活性剂给药指征方面差异很大。大多数(89%)仅使用FiO₂阈值或与其他标准联合使用,如Silverman评分/呼吸困难体征(41%)或肺部超声检查结果(3%)。42%的NICU给予预防性表面活性剂。报告了在极不成熟婴儿中使用LISA的差异(例如,36%在24 - 26周以下的婴儿中未进行LISA)。首选的镇静药物是(依托)氯胺酮,其次是丙泊酚和咪达唑仑。后续LISA操作之间的最短时间间隔为4(2 - 6)小时。大多数NICU(69%)使用专门为LISA设计的导管。

结论

本次调查表明,LISA在德国NICU中是常见的做法,但在实际操作方面存在相当大的差异。这些数据可为尚未实施LISA的NICU提供指导,并可能有助于设计旨在规范和/或优化LISA的临床试验。

相似文献

1
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants in Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Germany: A Survey.德国三级新生儿重症监护病房中早产儿的微创表面活性剂给药:一项调查
Neonatology. 2025;122(1):46-55. doi: 10.1159/000539302. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
2
Analgosedation for less-invasive surfactant administration: Variations in practice.经鼻给予表面活性物质时的镇静:实践中的差异。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Mar;59(3):750-757. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26826. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
European perspective on less invasive surfactant administration-a survey.欧洲对于微创表面活性剂给药的观点——一项调查
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;176(2):147-154. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2812-9. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
4
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.
5
Effectiveness and safety profile of introducing less invasive surfactant administration in management of respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary neonatal unit in Hong Kong.在呼吸窘迫综合征管理中引入侵入性较小的表面活性剂给药的有效性和安全性:香港一家三级新生儿病房的回顾性队列研究。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2025 Mar;66(2):147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.12.013. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
6
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
7
Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA).一种用于微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)的应用辅助设备的临床评估。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Mar;106(2):211-214. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319792. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
Should less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) become routine practice in US neonatal units?在美国新生儿病房中,是否应将侵入性更小的表面活性剂给药(LISA)常规化?
Pediatr Res. 2023 Apr;93(5):1188-1198. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02265-8. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Changes in practice of less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in United Kingdom neonatal units.英国新生儿病房微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)实践的变化
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Feb;114(2):393-397. doi: 10.1111/apa.17446. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
10
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Spain: A Survey Regarding Its Practice, the Target Population, and Premedication Use.西班牙的微创表面活性剂给药:一项关于其应用实践、目标人群和用药前准备的调查。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Feb;37(3):277-280. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678534. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Preterm Infants - State of the Art.经鼻给予早产儿表面活性物质治疗——最新进展。
Neonatology. 2024;121(5):584-595. doi: 10.1159/000540078. Epub 2024 Sep 3.