• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产子宫瘢痕缺损使用倒刺缝线与传统缝线的比较:一项随机临床试验

Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Maki Jota, Mitoma Tomohiro, Ooba Hikaru, Nakato Hikari, Mishima Sakurako, Tani Kazumasa, Eto Eriko, Yamamoto Dan, Yamamoto Risa, Kai Kenji, Tamada Takashi, Akamatsu Kazuyo, Kawanishi Kunihiro, Masuyama Hisashi

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Maki, Mitoma, Ooba, Nakato, Mishima, Tani, Eto, and Masuyama), Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Maki, Mitoma, Ooba, Nakato, Mishima, Tani, Eto, and Masuyama), Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Sep;6(9):101431. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101431. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101431
PMID:39019212
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of barbed sutures in preventing myometrial defects and enhancing postpartum outcomes after cesarean section (C-section) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of uterine scar defects after C-section with barbed and conventional smooth thread sutures.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Four obstetrics and gynecology departments across three Japanese healthcare regions were included. The participants were women requiring their first cesarean delivery between May 2020 and March 2023. Of the 1211 participants enrolled, 298 underwent C-section and 253 were followed up until July 2023. Participants with singleton pregnancies were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either conventional or spiral thread sutures with a double-layer continuous suture. The study period comprised the time of consent to the 6- to 7-month examination. The primary endpoint was the rate of scar niches >2 mm evaluated using transvaginal ultrasonography at 6 to 7 months after surgery. Additional metrics included the total operative time, suture application time, operative blood loss, number of additional sutures required for hemostasis, maternal surgical complications, postoperative infections, surgeon's years of experience, and individual subscale scores.

RESULTS

All data of the 220 participants (barbed suture group: 110; conventional suture group: 110) were available, thus enabling a full analysis set. A comparison of the barbed and conventional suture groups, respectively, revealed the following: niche length, 2.45±1.65 mm (range: 1.0-6.7) vs 3.79±1.84 mm (range: 1.0-11.0) (P<.001); niche depth, 1.78±1.07 mm (range: 1.0-5.7) vs 2.70±1.34 mm (range: 1.0-7.3) (P<.001); residual myometrial thickness (RMT), 8.46±1.74 mm (range: 4.8-13.0) vs 7.07±2.186 mm (range: 2.2-16.2) (P<.001); and niche width, 1.58±2.73 mm (range: 0.0-14.0) vs 2.88±2.36 mm (range: 0.0-11.0) (P<.001), respectively. The barbed suture group exhibited no defects and an RMT <3 mm. Furthermore, the barbed suture group had a lower rate of uterine niches (29.1%; n=32/110) than the conventional suture group (68.2%; n=75/110). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in operative times, maternal surgical complications, or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Double-layer barbed sutures during cesarean delivery may prevent C-section scar defects and postoperative complications. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

摘要

背景

倒刺缝线在剖宫产术后预防子宫肌层缺损及改善产后结局方面的作用尚不确定。

目的

本研究比较了剖宫产术后使用倒刺缝线与传统光滑缝线时子宫瘢痕缺损的临床和超声检查结果。

研究设计

这是一项多中心、平行组、随机对照临床试验。纳入了日本三个医疗区域的四个妇产科科室。参与者为2020年5月至2023年3月期间首次行剖宫产的女性。在纳入的1211名参与者中,298例行剖宫产,253名随访至2023年7月。单胎妊娠的参与者被随机分配(1:1比例)接受传统缝线或螺旋缝线双层连续缝合。研究期为从同意参与至术后6至7个月检查的时间段。主要终点是术后6至7个月经阴道超声检查评估的瘢痕凹陷>2 mm的发生率。其他指标包括总手术时间、缝线应用时间、术中失血量、止血所需额外缝线数量、产妇手术并发症、术后感染、外科医生的经验年限以及各个子量表评分。

结果

220名参与者(倒刺缝线组:110名;传统缝线组:110名)的所有数据均可用,因此可以进行完整分析集。分别比较倒刺缝线组和传统缝线组,结果如下:瘢痕凹陷长度,2.45±1.65 mm(范围:1.0 - 6.7) vs 3.79±1.84 mm(范围:1.0 - 11.0)(P <.001);瘢痕凹陷深度,1.78±1.07 mm(范围:1.0 - 5.7) vs 2.70±1.34 mm(范围:1.0 - 7.3)(P <.001);残余子宫肌层厚度(RMT),8.46±1.74 mm(范围:4.8 - 13.0) vs 7.07±2.186 mm(范围:2.2 - 16.2)(P <.001);以及瘢痕凹陷宽度,1.58±2.73 mm(范围:0.0 - 14.0) vs 2.88±2.36 mm(范围:0.0 - 11.0)(P <.001)。倒刺缝线组无缺损且RMT <3 mm。此外,倒刺缝线组的子宫瘢痕凹陷发生率(29.1%;n = 32/110)低于传统缝线组(68.2%;n = 75/110)。次要结局显示手术时间、产妇手术并发症或术后并发症无显著差异。

结论

剖宫产术中使用双层倒刺缝线可能预防剖宫产瘢痕缺损及术后并发症。文章末尾提供了西班牙语摘要。

相似文献

1
Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial.剖宫产子宫瘢痕缺损使用倒刺缝线与传统缝线的比较:一项随机临床试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Sep;6(9):101431. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101431. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
The Spiral Trial: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of Spiral thread sutures versus conventional thread sutures to prevent thinning of uterine scars following elective cesarean section.螺旋纹缝线与传统缝线预防择期剖宫产子宫瘢痕变薄的多中心随机对照试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106449. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.荷包缝合式子宫缝合术对剖宫产术后瘢痕愈合的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100992. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100992. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
4
Barbed vs conventional suture at cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术中使用倒刺缝线与传统缝线的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jun;100(6):1010-1018. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14080. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study.双层倒刺缝线缝合关闭子宫后剖宫产憩室的发生率及超声特点:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;162(3):895-905. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14744. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial.剖宫产术中子宫缝合使用倒刺缝线与传统缝线的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(5):710-717. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1388368. Epub 2017 Oct 29.
7
A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery.随机临床试验:剖宫产术中应用免打结倒刺缝线与传统缝线缝合子宫切口的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):343.e1-343.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
8
Monofilament vs multifilament suture for uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.单线与多线缝线在剖宫产时用于子宫关闭的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 May;4(3):100592. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100592. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
9
Impact of selected risk factors on uterine healing after cesarean section in women with single-layer uterine closure: A prospective study using two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.单层子宫缝合的剖宫产术后选定风险因素对子宫愈合的影响:一项使用二维和三维经阴道超声检查的前瞻性研究
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Jan;31(1):41-48. doi: 10.17219/acem/142519.
10
Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.二维和三维经阴道超声评估选定产科危险因素对剖宫产切口憩室形成的影响:病例对照研究。
Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(5):378-382. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0024. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Placenta accreta spectrum.胎盘植入谱系疾病
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Jun 5;11(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00624-3.