Suppr超能文献

左束支区域起搏部位除颤器导线的可行性、安全性和短期随访:一项初步研究。

Feasibility, safety, and short-term follow-up of defibrillator lead at left bundle branch area pacing location: A pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Velammal Medical College, Madurai, India.

Department of Microbiology, Velammal Medical College, Madurai, India.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2024 Oct;21(10):1900-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.020. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been increasingly adopted as an alternative modality to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The feasibility and safety of using an LBBAP lead to provide sensing of ventricular arrhythmia in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) with CRT has been demonstrated recently.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study was to analyze the feasibility, safety, and short-term follow-up of a traditional defibrillator lead at the LBBAP location.

METHODS

Patients who underwent successful LBBAP defibrillator using DF-1/DF-4 lead and delivery catheter were included in the study. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed after implantation to assess the ability of the LBBAP defibrillator lead to sense and provide appropriate therapy for ventricular arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Although the ICD lead could be successfully deployed in the left bundle branch area in 7 of 8 patients, it was repositioned to the right ventricular (RV) apex because of atrial oversensing in 1 patient and cheesy septum in another patient. Acute procedural success was 62.5% (5/8 patients). Mean patient age was 62.6 ± 21.6 years. Mean procedural duration was 115.6 ± 38.1 minutes, with LBBAP defibrillator lead fluoroscopy duration of 10.6 ± 3.5 minutes. Mean capture threshold was 0.58 ± 0.23V/0.4 ms, sensed R-wave amplitude 9.6 ± 2.2 mV, pacing impedance 560 ± 145 Ω, and shock impedance 65.4 ± 5.5 Ω. Defibrillation testing was successful in inducing ventricular fibrillation and could be sensed and reverted promptly by the shock delivered through the lead. During mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 2.2 months, pacing parameters remained stable. No episodes of inappropriate arrhythmia detection or therapy delivery occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LBBAP defibrillator is feasible, safe, and effective during short-term follow-up. DFT testing at the time of implantation will help to ensure appropriate sensing and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.

摘要

背景

左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)已被越来越多地采用作为心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的替代方式。最近已经证明,在接受 CRT 的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的患者中,使用 LBBAP 导联感知室性心律失常的可行性和安全性。

目的

我们的研究目的是分析传统除颤器导联在 LBBAP 位置的可行性、安全性和短期随访结果。

方法

本研究纳入了使用 DF-1/DF-4 导联和输送导管成功进行 LBBAP 除颤的患者。植入后进行除颤阈值(DFT)测试,以评估 LBBAP 除颤导联感知和提供适当治疗室性心律失常的能力。

结果

尽管在 8 名患者中有 7 名患者的 ICD 导联可以成功地部署在左束支区域,但由于 1 名患者出现心房过感知,另 1 名患者出现奶酪样隔瓣,该导联被重新定位至右心室(RV)心尖。急性手术成功率为 62.5%(5/8 名患者)。患者平均年龄为 62.6±21.6 岁。平均手术时间为 115.6±38.1 分钟,LBBAP 除颤器导联透视时间为 10.6±3.5 分钟。平均捕获阈值为 0.58±0.23V/0.4ms,感知 R 波振幅为 9.6±2.2mV,起搏阻抗为 560±145Ω,电击阻抗为 65.4±5.5Ω。除颤测试成功地诱发了心室颤动,并且可以通过导联传递的电击迅速感知并逆转。在平均 3.8±2.2 个月的随访期间,起搏参数保持稳定。随访期间未发生不适当的心律失常检测或治疗输送事件。

结论

在短期随访期间,LBBAP 除颤器是可行、安全和有效的。植入时的 DFT 测试将有助于确保对室性心律失常的适当感知和治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验