Suppr超能文献

用于 COVID-19 院前治疗的抗病毒药物和中和单克隆抗体的安全性。

The safety of antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies used in prehospital treatment of Covid-19.

机构信息

Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, UK.

Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Infect. 2024 Sep;89(3):106227. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106227. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This proof-of-principle pharmacovigilance study used Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to examine the safety of sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir in prehospital treatment of Covid-19.

METHOD

With NHS England approval, we conducted an observational cohort study using OpenSAFELY-TPP, a secure software-platform which executes analyses across EHRs for 24 million people in England. High-risk individuals with Covid-19 eligible for prehospital treatment were included. Adverse events (AEs) were categorised into events in the drug's Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), drug-reactions and immune-mediated. Cox models compared risk across treatments. A pre-pandemic record analysis was performed for comparative purposes.

RESULTS

Between 2021-2023, 37,449 patients received sotrovimab, paxlovid or molnupiravir whilst 109,647 patients made up an eligible-but-untreated population. The 28-day rates of AEs were low: SmPC 0.34 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI 0.32-0.36); drug-reactions 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.02) and immune-mediated 0.03 (95% CI 0.03-0.04), and similar or lower than the pre-pandemic period. Compared with the eligible but untreated population, sotrovimab and paxlovid associated with a risk of SmPC AE [adjHR 1.36 (95% CI 1.15-1.62) and 1.28 (95% CI 1.05-1.55), respectively], whilst sotrovimab associated with a risk of drug-reactions [adjHR 2.95 (95% CI 1.56-5.55)] and immune-mediated events [adjHR 3.22 (95% CI 1.86-5.57)].

CONCLUSION

Sotrovimab, paxlovid and molnupiravir demonstrate acceptable safety profiles. Although the risk of AEs was greatest with sotrovimab, event rates were lower than comparative pre-pandemic period.

摘要

目的

本原理验证药物警戒研究使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据来检查索特罗维单抗、奈玛特韦/利托那韦和莫努匹韦在 COVID-19 院前治疗中的安全性。

方法

在获得英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS England)批准的情况下,我们使用 OpenSAFELY-TPP 进行了一项观察性队列研究,OpenSAFELY-TPP 是一个安全的软件平台,可在英格兰 2400 万人的 EHR 中执行分析。纳入符合条件的 COVID-19 院前治疗高危人群。将不良事件(AE)分为药物产品特性摘要(SmPC)中的事件、药物反应和免疫介导的事件。Cox 模型比较了不同治疗方法的风险。还进行了大流行前记录分析,以便进行比较。

结果

2021 年至 2023 年期间,37449 名患者接受了索特罗维单抗、奈玛特韦/利托那韦或莫努匹韦治疗,而 109647 名患者构成了符合条件但未治疗的人群。28 天的 AE 发生率较低:SmPC 为 0.34/1000 患者年(95%CI 0.32-0.36);药物反应为 0.01(95%CI 0.01-0.02),免疫介导的为 0.03(95%CI 0.03-0.04),与大流行前时期相似或更低。与符合条件但未治疗的人群相比,索特罗维单抗和奈玛特韦/利托那韦与 SmPC AE 的风险相关[调整后的 HR(adjHR)分别为 1.36(95%CI 1.15-1.62)和 1.28(95%CI 1.05-1.55)],而索特罗维单抗与药物反应的风险相关[adjHR 2.95(95%CI 1.56-5.55)]和免疫介导的事件[adjHR 3.22(95%CI 1.86-5.57)]。

结论

索特罗维单抗、奈玛特韦/利托那韦和莫努匹韦显示出可接受的安全性。尽管索特罗维单抗的 AE 风险最大,但事件发生率低于大流行前的同期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验