• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项全国性前瞻性结直肠癌筛查队列研究中的招募策略与同意率:“航行研究”第一年的结果

Recruitment strategies and consent rates in a national prospective colorectal cancer screening cohort: results from year 1 of the Voyage Study.

作者信息

Yost Kathleen J, Carlson Rachel E, Kirt Christine R, Kirsch Emily J, Kneedler Bonny, Laffin Jennifer J, St Sauver Jennifer L, Finney Rutten Lila J, Grimm Jessica A, Olson Janet E

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 17;11(1):e001376. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001376.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001376
PMID:39019622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11288143/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal incentive protocol for maximising participation while managing study costs during the Voyage trial.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort (Voyage trial) of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality outcomes in individuals screened with multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) served as the population. A subset was randomised to receive postage stamps as a pre-consent incentive, or as a post-consent incentive after completion of the consent and questionnaire. Descriptive statistics from year 1 are reported.

RESULTS

During year 1 of the Voyage trial, a total of 600 258 individuals with mt-sDNA orders received at Exact Sciences Laboratories were randomly selected and invited to participate. Of those, 26 429 (4.4%) opted in, 14 365 of whom (54.3%) consented. The opt-in and consent samples were similar to the target population with respect to sex but differed by geographic residence and age (p<0.001). For the embedded incentive experiment, 2333 were randomised to the pre-incentive arm, while 2342 were randomised to the post-incentive arm. Overall consent rate in the incentive trial was 56.4% (60.9% for the pre-consent incentive arm (1421/2333) vs 52.0% for the post-consent incentive arm (1217/2342), p<0.001). Cost reduction was observed for the pre-consent incentive group, and higher response rates were seen among older versus younger individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-consent incentive option was associated with a higher participation rate and lower costs and was used for the remainder of study recruitment. CRC incidence and mortality vary with age; thus, adjusting for differential participation by age and region will be important in analyses of Voyage data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04124406.

摘要

目的

在“航行”试验中确定在控制研究成本的同时使参与度最大化的最佳激励方案。

设计

以接受多靶点粪便DNA(mt-sDNA)筛查的个体的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率和死亡率结果的前瞻性队列(“航行”试验)作为研究人群。一个亚组被随机分配接受邮票作为同意前激励,或在完成同意书和问卷后作为同意后激励。报告了第1年的描述性统计数据。

结果

在“航行”试验的第1年,共有600258名在Exact Sciences实验室接受mt-sDNA检测的个体被随机挑选并邀请参与。其中,26429人(4.4%)选择参与,其中14365人(54.3%)同意参与。选择参与和同意参与的样本在性别方面与目标人群相似,但在地理居住和年龄方面存在差异(p<0.001)。对于嵌入式激励实验,2333人被随机分配到激励前组,而2342人被随机分配到激励后组。激励试验中的总体同意率为56.4%(同意前激励组为60.9%(1421/2333),同意后激励组为52.0%(1217/2342),p<0.001)。同意前激励组的成本有所降低,且老年人的反应率高于年轻人。

结论

同意前激励方案与更高的参与率和更低的成本相关,并被用于研究招募的剩余部分。结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率随年龄而异;因此,在分析“航行”数据时,对年龄和地区的不同参与情况进行调整将很重要。

试验注册号

NCT04124406。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e40/11288143/b3c7d7bf6958/bmjgast-11-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e40/11288143/b3c7d7bf6958/bmjgast-11-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e40/11288143/b3c7d7bf6958/bmjgast-11-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Recruitment strategies and consent rates in a national prospective colorectal cancer screening cohort: results from year 1 of the Voyage Study.一项全国性前瞻性结直肠癌筛查队列研究中的招募策略与同意率:“航行研究”第一年的结果
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 17;11(1):e001376. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001376.
2
Colorectal cancer outcomes after screening with the multi-target stool DNA assay: protocol for a large-scale, prospective cohort study (the Voyage study).多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠癌的结局:一项大规模前瞻性队列研究(Voyage 研究)方案。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 19;7(1):e000353. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000353. eCollection 2020.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using a Multitarget Stool DNA Test: Modeling the Effect of the Intertest Interval on Clinical Effectiveness.使用多靶点粪便DNA检测筛查结直肠癌:模拟检测间隔对临床有效性的影响
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Sep;15(3):e65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
4
Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查和阳性检测后结肠镜检查中患者依从性对临床结局的影响。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):845-850. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0075. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠肿瘤的有效性和成本效益比较。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):427-439.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.分析两种用于筛查普通风险成年人结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测的有效性。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
8
Early Adoption of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.早期采用多靶点粪便DNA检测进行结直肠癌筛查。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 May;92(5):726-733. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.019.
9
Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.多靶点粪便DNA检测增加了既往不依从的医疗保险患者的结直肠癌筛查率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 21;23(3):464-471. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i3.464.
10
Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.利用 CRC-AIM 微观模拟模型估计基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查比较效果的差异依从性影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244431. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving demographics of eligible patient population can impact enrollment of a biomarker clinical study.符合条件的患者群体不断变化的人口统计学特征可能会影响生物标志物临床研究的入组情况。
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0323187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323187. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Socioeconomic, Disease-Related, and Personal Factors Associated With Participation in Remote Follow-Up in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.社会经济、疾病相关和个人因素与类风湿关节炎远程随访参与度的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Oct;75(10):2044-2053. doi: 10.1002/acr.25105. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
4
Specificity of the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk 45-49 Year-Olds: A Cross-Sectional Study.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在平均风险 45-49 岁人群结直肠癌筛查中的特异性:一项横断面研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Apr;14(4):489-496. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0294. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Comparison of Tissue-Based Molecular Markers in Younger versus Older Patients with Colorectal Neoplasia.年轻与老年结直肠肿瘤患者组织分子标志物的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Aug;29(8):1570-1576. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1598. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2018.生命体征:2018 年美国结直肠癌筛查检测使用情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 13;69(10):253-259. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6910a1.
7
Colorectal cancer outcomes after screening with the multi-target stool DNA assay: protocol for a large-scale, prospective cohort study (the Voyage study).多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠癌的结局:一项大规模前瞻性队列研究(Voyage 研究)方案。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 19;7(1):e000353. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000353. eCollection 2020.
8
Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population.基于大型社区人群的结直肠癌筛查对癌症发病率和死亡率的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1383-1391.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Post-sampling mortality and non-response patterns in the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey: Implications for epidemiological studies based on surveys of cancer patients.英国癌症患者体验调查中的抽样后死亡率和无应答模式:对基于癌症患者调查的流行病学研究的启示
Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;41:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Jan 18.