Broderick Amanda, Pan Elizabeth, Li Jinju, Chu Alec, Hwang Clara, Barata Pedro C, Cackowski Frank Cameron, Labriola Matthew, Ghose Alyssa, Bilen Mehmet Asim, Kilari Deepak, Thapa Bicky, Piero Michael, Graham Laura, Tripathi Abhishek, Garje Rohan, Koshkin Vadim S, Hernandez Erik, Dorff Tanya B, Schweizer Michael Thomas, Alva Ajjai Shivaram, McKay Rana R, Armstrong Andrew J
Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jun;28(2):419-426. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00869-1. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Aberrant Wnt signaling has been implicated in prostate cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis in preclinical models but the impact of genetic alterations in Wnt signaling genes in men with advanced prostate cancer is unknown.
We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical-genomic database for this retrospective analysis. Patients with activating mutations in CTNNB1 or RSPO2 or inactivating mutations in APC, RNF43, or ZNRF3 were defined as Wnt-altered, while those lacking such alterations were defined as Wnt non-altered. We compared patient characteristics and clinical outcomes as well as co-occurring genetic alterations according to Wnt alteration status.
Of the 1498 patients included, 193 (12.9%) were Wnt-altered. These men had a statistically significant 2-fold increased prevalence of liver and lung metastases as compared with Wnt non-altered patients at the time of initial diagnosis, (4.66% v 2.15% ; 6.22% v 3.07%), first metastatic disease diagnosis (10.88% v 5.29%; 13.99% v 6.21%), and CRPC development (11.40% v 6.36%; 12.95% v 5.29%). Wnt alterations were associated with more co-occurring alterations in RB1 (10.4% v 6.2%), AR (38.9% vs 25.7%), SPOP (13.5% vs 4.1%), FOXA1 (6.7% vs 2.8%), and PIK3CA (10.9% vs 5.1%). We found no significant differences in overall survival or other clinical outcomes from initial diagnosis, first metastatic disease, diagnosis of CRPC, or with AR inhibition for mCRPC between the Wnt groups.
Wnt-altered patients with prostate cancer have a higher prevalence of visceral metastases and are enriched in RB1, AR, SPOP, FOXA1, and PIK3CA alterations. Despite these associations, Wnt alterations were not associated with worse survival or treatment outcomes in men with advanced prostate cancer.
在临床前模型中,异常的Wnt信号传导与前列腺癌的发生和转移有关,但Wnt信号基因的基因改变对晚期前列腺癌男性患者的影响尚不清楚。
我们利用前列腺癌精准医学多机构协作项目(PROMISE)临床基因组数据库进行这项回顾性分析。CTNNB1或RSPO2激活突变或APC、RNF43或ZNRF3失活突变的患者被定义为Wnt改变型,而缺乏此类改变的患者被定义为Wnt未改变型。我们根据Wnt改变状态比较了患者特征、临床结局以及同时发生的基因改变。
在纳入的1498例患者中,193例(12.9%)为Wnt改变型。与Wnt未改变型患者相比,这些男性在初诊时肝转移和肺转移的患病率显著增加2倍(4.66%对2.15%;6.22%对3.07%),首次转移疾病诊断时(10.88%对5.29%;13.99%对6.21%),以及去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)发生时(11.40%对6.36%;12.95%对5.29%)。Wnt改变与RB1(10.4%对6.2%)、AR(38.9%对25.7%)、SPOP(13.5%对4.1%)、FOXA1(6.7%对2.8%)和PIK3CA(10.9%对5.1%)中更多同时发生的改变相关。我们发现Wnt组之间在总生存期或从初诊、首次转移疾病、CRPC诊断或mCRPC的AR抑制开始的其他临床结局方面没有显著差异。
Wnt改变的前列腺癌患者内脏转移的患病率较高,并富集了RB1、AR、SPOP、FOXA1和PIK3CA改变。尽管有这些关联,但Wnt改变与晚期前列腺癌男性患者较差的生存或治疗结局无关。