Mungo Chemtai, Adewumi Konyin, Ellis Grace, Rop Mercy, Adoyo Everlyn, Zou Yating, Rahangdale Lisa
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Jun 24;18:1719. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1719. eCollection 2024.
Cervical cancer continues to be a major health issue in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite increasing access to screening, access to precancer treatment remains a significant challenge in LMICs, highlighting a need for innovative, accessible and resource-appropriate treatment approaches, including self-administered therapies.
A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted among men aged 25-65 with a current female partner in Kisumu County, Kenya. Participants were sequentially recruited and surveyed to evaluate their understanding of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer, their views on screening and treatment and their attitudes toward self-administered therapies. Focus group discussions (FGDs) with a subset of the survey participants further explored their treatment preferences and perceptions.
Two hundred fourteen men participated in the survey, and 39 men participated in FGDs. The median age was 39 years, and 51% had a primary school education or less. Most (96%) were in a committed relationship, and 74% earned $10 or less daily. There was strong support for self-administered topical therapies, with 98% willing to support their partners using such treatments if available. Additionally, most participants were open to supporting necessary abstinence or condom use, though 76% believed their partners might hesitate to request condom use. When given an option, most preferred their partner to self-administer such therapies at home compared to provider administration at a health facility, citing convenience, cost-effectiveness and privacy. Preferences varied between two potential therapies, 5-Fluorouracil and Artesunate, based on their administration frequency, duration and abstinence requirements. Qualitative findings largely supported the quantitative analysis.
The study demonstrates strong support for self-administered topical therapies for cervical precancer among Kenyan men. Additional research on acceptability, feasibility and efficacy in different LMICs could pave the way for these therapies to help bridge current cervical precancer treatment gaps in these settings.
宫颈癌在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)仍然是一个重大的健康问题。尽管筛查的可及性不断提高,但在LMICs中,癌前病变治疗的可及性仍然是一项重大挑战,这凸显了对创新、可及且适合资源状况的治疗方法的需求,包括自我给药疗法。
在肯尼亚基苏木县,对年龄在25至65岁且目前有女性伴侣的男性进行了一项横断面混合方法研究。参与者被依次招募并接受调查,以评估他们对人乳头瘤病毒和宫颈癌的了解、他们对筛查和治疗的看法以及他们对自我给药疗法的态度。与部分调查参与者进行的焦点小组讨论(FGD)进一步探讨了他们的治疗偏好和认知。
214名男性参与了调查,39名男性参与了FGD。中位年龄为39岁,51%的人接受过小学及以下教育。大多数(96%)处于稳定关系中,74%的人日收入为10美元或更少。对自我给药的局部疗法有强烈支持,98%的人表示如果有此类治疗,愿意支持他们的伴侣使用。此外,大多数参与者愿意支持必要的禁欲或使用避孕套,尽管76%的人认为他们的伴侣可能会犹豫是否要求使用避孕套。在有选择的情况下,与在医疗机构由医护人员给药相比,大多数人更希望他们的伴侣在家中自我给药,理由是方便、性价比高和隐私性好。基于两种潜在疗法(5-氟尿嘧啶和青蒿琥酯)的给药频率、持续时间和禁欲要求,偏好有所不同。定性研究结果在很大程度上支持了定量分析。
该研究表明肯尼亚男性对宫颈癌前病变自我给药的局部疗法有强烈支持。在不同LMICs中对可接受性(接受程度)、可行性和疗效进行的更多研究,可能为这些疗法帮助弥合当前这些地区宫颈癌前病变治疗差距铺平道路。