• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单药、双联和三联吸入性糖皮质激素疗法在降低重度哮喘加重未来风险方面的疗效差异:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。

Differences in the effectiveness of single, dual, and triple inhaled corticosteroid therapy for reducing future risk of severe asthma exacerbation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yamasaki Akira, Tomita Katsuyuki, Inui Genki, Okazaki Ryota, Harada Tomoya

机构信息

Division of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Yonago Medical Center, Tottori, Japan.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(12):e31186. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31186. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31186
PMID:39022061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11252599/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The effectiveness of different combinations of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapies in reducing severe exacerbations of adult asthma remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This network meta-analysis (NMA) extensively evaluated the treatment effects of single ICS; dual ICS i.e., ICS/long-acting β2-adrenergic agonists (LABA); ICS/LABA as single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART); and triple ICS, i.e., ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) in preventing severe asthma exacerbations.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of English databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, was conducted until December 31, 2022, using PRISMA-NMA.

STUDY SELECTION

Using the PICOS criteria, the questions for this study were carefully selected so that the correct keywords could be identified.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A pairwise meta-analysis was used to select trials based on the criteria for minimizing heterogeneity (I). Subsequently, the "BUGSnet" package of R software was used to perform a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were risk rate and annualized rate ratio of severe asthma exacerbations.

RESULTS

This review included 56 randomized control trials (RCTs; n = 78,171 patients). As the pairwise meta-analysis demonstrated that the annualized rate ratio of severe asthma exacerbation had moderate heterogeneity, we analyzed the risk rate of severe asthma exacerbation using a network meta-analysis. In terms of direct/indirect comparisons with non-ICS, single ICS, dual ICS, SMART, and triple ICS reduced severe asthma exacerbations by 34 %, 47 %, 58 %, and 57 %, respectively. SMART and triple ICS showed high effectiveness in reducing severe exacerbations.

CONCLUSION

AND RELEVANCE: SMART and triple ICS were ranked higher in effectiveness in reducing severe asthma exacerbations in comparison with other therapies, indicating that these are the most effective treatments for reducing the future risk of severe asthma exacerbations.

摘要

重要性

吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)不同联合疗法在降低成人哮喘严重发作方面的有效性仍不明确。

目的

本网状Meta分析(NMA)广泛评估了单一ICS、双重ICS(即ICS/长效β2肾上腺素能激动剂[LABA])、作为单药维持和缓解治疗(SMART)的ICS/LABA以及三联ICS(即ICS/LABA/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂[LAMA])预防严重哮喘发作的治疗效果。

数据来源

采用PRISMA-NMA对包括PubMed和Web of Science在内的英文数据库进行系统检索,直至2022年12月31日。

研究选择

使用PICOS标准,仔细选择本研究的问题,以便确定正确的关键词。

数据提取与合成

采用成对Meta分析,根据最小化异质性(I)的标准选择试验。随后,使用R软件的“BUGSnet”包进行贝叶斯网状Meta分析。

主要结局指标

主要结局指标为严重哮喘发作的风险率和年化率比。

结果

本综述纳入了56项随机对照试验(RCT;n = 78171例患者)。由于成对Meta分析表明严重哮喘发作的年化率比具有中度异质性,我们使用网状Meta分析分析了严重哮喘发作的风险率。与非ICS进行直接/间接比较时,单一ICS、双重ICS、SMART和三联ICS分别将严重哮喘发作减少了34%、47%、58%和57%。SMART和三联ICS在减少严重发作方面显示出高效性。

结论及相关性

与其他疗法相比,SMART和三联ICS在降低严重哮喘发作方面的有效性排名更高,表明这些是降低未来严重哮喘发作风险的最有效治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/7f721c519d1e/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/3ed0822d8513/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/db22cdcbb8dd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/d1264437d92c/gr3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/4325d5b0e541/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/7f721c519d1e/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/3ed0822d8513/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/db22cdcbb8dd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/d1264437d92c/gr3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/4325d5b0e541/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5569/11252599/7f721c519d1e/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in the effectiveness of single, dual, and triple inhaled corticosteroid therapy for reducing future risk of severe asthma exacerbation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.单药、双联和三联吸入性糖皮质激素疗法在降低重度哮喘加重未来风险方面的疗效差异:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(12):e31186. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31186. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较双三联吸入疗法与吸入性皮质类固醇不同剂量治疗青少年和成人哮喘的有效性和耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):CD013799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013799.pub2.
3
Efficacy of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) Versus Other Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗干粉吸入剂(BGF MDI)对比其他吸入性皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2956-2975. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
4
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to combination long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) versus LABA/ICS for adults with asthma.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合长效β2受体激动剂和吸入性糖皮质激素(LABA/ICS)与LABA/ICS用于成人哮喘患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 21;2016(1):CD011721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011721.pub2.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗与其他三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效和安全性:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):3089-3112. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长效吸入疗法(β受体激动剂、抗胆碱能药物和类固醇):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2.
7
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Triple Therapy Compared with Other Therapies for the Treatment of COPD: A Network Meta-Analysis.糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)三联疗法与其他 COPD 治疗药物的比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Sep;39(9):3957-3978. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02231-0. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
8
Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入性皮质类固醇联合吸入长效β2-激动剂和长效抗胆碱能药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD011600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011600.pub3.
9
Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among regular inhaled therapies for patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者常规吸入治疗的恶化和死亡率:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 15;16(11):e1002958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002958. eCollection 2019 Nov.
10
Triple vs Dual Inhaler Therapy and Asthma Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.三联吸入器疗法与中重度哮喘的哮喘结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2466-2479. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7872.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing medication adherence in adults with asthma and its effect on rescue therapy for exacerbations.评估成年哮喘患者的药物依从性及其对急性加重期急救治疗的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 4;16:1516062. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1516062. eCollection 2025.
2
Medicare Advantage Population in the United States: Outcomes of Patients with Asthma Treated with ICS/LABA Before and After Initiation with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI).美国医疗保险优势人群:使用糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)起始治疗前后接受吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)治疗的哮喘患者的结局
Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):1061-1074. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03083-6. Epub 2024 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较双三联吸入疗法与吸入性皮质类固醇不同剂量治疗青少年和成人哮喘的有效性和耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):CD013799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013799.pub2.
2
Different inhaled corticosteroid doses in triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病中不同吸入性皮质类固醇剂量:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 20;12(1):15698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18353-y.
3
Albuterol-Budesonide Fixed-Dose Combination Rescue Inhaler for Asthma.沙美特罗替卡松干粉吸入剂(舒利迭)治疗哮喘。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 2;386(22):2071-2083. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203163. Epub 2022 May 15.
4
Comparative efficacy of inhalers in mild-to-moderate asthma: systematic review and network meta-analysis.在轻中度哮喘中,吸入器的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 8;12(1):5949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09941-z.
5
Evaluation of Budesonide-Formoterol for Maintenance and Reliever Therapy Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.布地奈德福莫特罗治疗控制不佳哮喘患者的维持和缓解治疗的评价:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220615. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0615.
6
Understanding the role of long-acting muscarinic antagonists in asthma treatment.了解长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂在哮喘治疗中的作用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Apr;128(4):352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.020. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
7
SMART for the treatment of asthma: A network meta-analysis of real-world evidence.SMART用于哮喘治疗:真实世界证据的网状Meta分析
Respir Med. 2021 Nov;188:106611. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106611. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
8
Severe asthma exacerbations in the United States:: Incidence, characteristics, predictors, and effects of biologic treatments.美国严重哮喘恶化情况:发生率、特征、预测因素和生物治疗的效果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Nov;127(5):579-587.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
9
Triple vs Dual Inhaler Therapy and Asthma Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.三联吸入器疗法与中重度哮喘的哮喘结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2466-2479. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7872.
10
Triple therapy in uncontrolled asthma: a network meta-analysis of phase III studies.未控制哮喘的三联疗法:III 期研究的网络荟萃分析。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Sep 2;58(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.04233-2020. Print 2021 Sep.