Yu Ying-Liang, Qian Cong, Yang Bei, Yang Lin-Zhang, He Shi-Ying, Xue Li-Hong
Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jul 8;45(7):4023-4031. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202308074.
Nitrogen loss from rice systems is an important source of agricultural non-point source pollution. Many studies revolve around reducing the rate of nitrogen fertilizer application. However, studies examining the characteristics of nitrogen loss in multiple loss paths (runoff, leaching, and lateral seepage) under different straw and fertilizer managements are lacking. Therefore, a study was carried out based on a rice field planted for more than 20 years with straw continuously returned to the field for more than 5 years in Taihu lake basin. The effects of straw and fertilizer managements on nitrogen loss in different paths during the whole growth period of rice were studied. Moreover, straw and fertilizer managements were evaluated by their production suitability and environmental friendliness based on crop yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen loss. The results showed that straw removal from the field increased the response sensitivity of nitrogen accumulation in plant tissue to nitrogen application. The nitrogen loss in the rice season was 9-17 kg·hm, accounting for 5%-7% of the nitrogen application rate. Straw removal increased the risk of nitrogen loss when soaking water discharged. Straw returning could decrease the nitrogen loss by more than 15%, though the effect of straw on nitrogen loss via lateral seepage was not clear. Furthermore, the suitable substitution of organic fertilizer (30% in this study) could respectively reduce the amount of nitrogen loss via runoff, leaching, and lateral seepage by 16%, 26%, and 37% compared with the fertilizer application under the same nitrogen gradient. In conclusion, the implementation of straw returning and fertilizer type optimization measures effectively reduced the nitrogen loss for unit weight of rice production and realized the balance between agricultural production and environmental protection.
稻田系统的氮素流失是农业面源污染的一个重要来源。许多研究围绕降低氮肥施用量展开。然而,缺乏关于不同秸秆和肥料管理方式下多种流失途径(径流、淋溶和侧向渗漏)中氮素流失特征的研究。因此,基于太湖流域一块种植了20多年且连续5年以上秸秆还田的稻田开展了一项研究。研究了秸秆和肥料管理方式对水稻全生育期不同途径氮素流失的影响。此外,基于作物产量、氮素利用效率和氮素流失情况,从生产适宜性和环境友好性方面对秸秆和肥料管理方式进行了评估。结果表明,田间去除秸秆增加了植物组织中氮素积累对施氮的响应敏感性。水稻季氮素流失量为9 - 17 kg·hm,占施氮量的5% - 7%。去除秸秆增加了排水时氮素流失的风险。秸秆还田可使氮素流失减少15%以上,不过秸秆对侧向渗漏途径氮素流失的影响不明确。此外,与相同氮素梯度下施肥相比,适宜比例(本研究中为30%)的有机肥替代可分别使径流、淋溶和侧向渗漏途径的氮素流失量减少16%、26%和37%。总之,实施秸秆还田和肥料类型优化措施有效降低了单位水稻产量的氮素流失,实现了农业生产与环境保护之间的平衡。