Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;244:108356. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108356. Epub 2024 May 26.
Early mobilization benefits critically ill patients, but concerns persist, especially in neurologic intensive care unit patients with acute brain injuries. This study assesses early mobility's impact on cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) and systemic hemodynamics.
This single-center retrospective study focused on adult neurologic intensive care unit patients undergoing passive cycle ergometry. Data were collected from December 2020 to April 2022. Physical therapists conducted sessions using a standardized protocol, monitoring mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). The Pressure Reactivity Index (PRx) was calculated as a measure of CA. Statistical analysis included mixed models and repeated measures ANOVA.
Eleven patients undergoing continuous physiologic monitoring and early mobility were included, primarily with subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracranial hemorrhage. Median time to protocol initiation was 4 days, with two patients discontinuing due to hemodynamic disturbances. Over a total of 11-hours of neuromonitoring data, passive cycling demonstrated a significant reduction in heart rate (HR), MAP, and ICP across different rotations per minute (RPM) settings compared to baseline. No significant alterations in PRx or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were noted at various RPM levels. However, a significant difference in PRx emerged between patients who completed the protocol and those who did not, particularly at 10 RPM.
This study offers preliminary insights into the impact of early mobility on CA in acute brain injured patients. While passive cycling demonstrates promise in preserving cerebral hemodynamics, its tolerability may not be uniform across all brain-injured patients. These findings highlight the need to determine optimal early mobilization timing and intensity in this population, emphasizing the necessity for larger prospective studies to validate these findings and inform clinical practice.
This manuscript complies with all instructions to the authors. All coauthors meet the authorship requirements and have reviewed and approved the contents of the manuscript. The manuscript has not been published totally or partly, accepted for publication, or under editorial review for publication elsewhere. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. STROBE checklist was reviewed prior to the submission of this paper. The manuscript adheres to ethical guidelines and was approved by Cleveland Clinic's institutional research board for retrospective study. There is no funding to disclose for this study.
早期活动对危重症患者有益,但仍存在一些担忧,尤其是在急性脑损伤的神经重症监护病房患者中。本研究评估了早期活动对脑血管自动调节(CA)和全身血液动力学的影响。
这是一项单中心回顾性研究,关注接受被动循环运动的成年神经重症监护病房患者。数据收集自 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 4 月。物理治疗师使用标准化方案进行治疗,监测平均动脉血压(MAP)和颅内压(ICP)。压力反应指数(PRx)被计算为 CA 的指标。统计分析包括混合模型和重复测量方差分析。
纳入了 11 名接受连续生理监测和早期活动的患者,主要患有蛛网膜下腔出血或颅内出血。开始方案的中位时间为 4 天,有 2 名患者因血液动力学障碍而中断。在总共 11 小时的神经监测数据中,与基线相比,在不同的每分钟旋转次数(RPM)设置下,被动循环显著降低了心率(HR)、MAP 和 ICP。在不同的 RPM 水平下,PRx 或脑灌注压(CPP)没有明显变化。然而,在完成方案和未完成方案的患者之间,PRx 存在显著差异,尤其是在 10 RPM 时。
本研究初步探讨了早期活动对急性脑损伤患者 CA 的影响。虽然被动循环在维持脑血液动力学方面表现出了一定的前景,但它在所有脑损伤患者中的耐受性可能并不一致。这些发现强调了在这一人群中确定最佳早期活动时机和强度的必要性,需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现并为临床实践提供依据。
本文稿完全符合作者指南。所有共同作者均符合作者要求,并已审阅和批准了手稿的内容。该手稿未全文或部分发表,未接受发表,或不在其他地方进行编辑审查以发表。我们没有利益冲突需要披露。在提交本文之前,我们已经审查了 STROBE 清单。该手稿符合伦理准则,并获得克利夫兰诊所机构研究委员会的批准进行回顾性研究。本研究无资金支持。