Nutrition Impact, LLC, Battle Creek, MI, United States.
Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, OH, United States.
J Nutr. 2024 Sep;154(9):2732-2742. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.07.022. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
Current guidelines for the treatment of obesity recommend dietary restriction to create a caloric deficit, and caloric reductions of 16% to 68% have been achieved in adults with overweight or obesity engaging in intentional weight loss programs.
This study models the impact of simulated caloric reduction on nutrient adequacy among U.S. adults ≥19 y with overweight or obesity using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (2015-2018).
Four levels of caloric reduction (20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) were modeled by prorating daily calorie intake such that usual intakes of 14 nutrients were reduced proportional to caloric reduction. The percentages below the estimated average requirement (EAR) or above the adequate intake (AI) were estimated at each level of caloric reduction, with and without dietary supplement use. Differences across percentages of simulated caloric reductions were determined using nonoverlapping confidence intervals of the means (97.5 percentile confidence intervals were used to approximate P < 0.05).
There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in percentages below the EAR (above the AI) between sequential levels of simulated caloric reduction for most of the nutrients analyzed (protein, vitamins A, B-6, folate, and C, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, and zinc). For example, after a simulated 30% caloric reduction, 25%-40% of the population had intakes below the EAR for protein, vitamin B-6, and zinc, and 75%-91% of the population had intakes below the EAR for vitamin A, calcium, and magnesium (vs. 4%-18% and 45%-56%, respectively, without caloric reduction). With the inclusion of dietary supplements, percentages below the EAR for all nutrients (except protein) were lower than those for food alone.
Caloric reduction may exacerbate nutrient inadequacies among adults with overweight or obesity. Inclusion of nutrient-dense foods, fortified foods, specially formulated products, and/or dietary supplements should be considered for those on calorie-restricted diets for long-term weight loss.
目前治疗肥胖症的指南建议通过饮食限制来制造热量缺口,超重或肥胖的成年人在参与有意减肥计划时,已实现了 16%至 68%的热量减少。
本研究使用国家健康和营养调查数据(2015-2018 年)模拟热量减少对美国≥19 岁超重或肥胖成年人营养素充足程度的影响。
通过按比例分配每日卡路里摄入量来模拟 4 个级别的卡路里减少(20%、30%、40%和 50%),使得常用的 14 种营养素的摄入量按卡路里减少的比例减少。在每个卡路里减少水平下,估计营养素的摄入量低于估计平均需求量(EAR)或高于充足摄入量(AI)的比例,同时考虑和不考虑膳食补充剂的使用。通过比较平均值的非重叠置信区间(使用 97.5%置信区间近似 P < 0.05)来确定模拟卡路里减少水平之间的差异。
对于大多数分析的营养素(蛋白质、维生素 A、B-6、叶酸和 C、钙、铁、镁、钾和锌),连续模拟卡路里减少水平之间的 EAR 以下(AI 以上)的百分比有显著差异(P < 0.05)。例如,模拟 30%的卡路里减少后,25%-40%的人群蛋白质、维生素 B-6 和锌的摄入量低于 EAR,75%-91%的人群维生素 A、钙和镁的摄入量低于 EAR(而没有卡路里减少时分别为 4%-18%和 45%-56%)。纳入膳食补充剂后,所有营养素(除蛋白质外)EAR 以下的比例均低于仅食用食物的情况。
热量减少可能会加剧超重或肥胖成年人的营养素不足。对于那些长期通过限制热量来减肥的人,应该考虑食用营养密集型食物、强化食品、特殊配方产品和/或膳食补充剂。