• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胰体尾切除术保留脾脏相关因素的分析——一项队列研究。

Analysis of Factors Determining Spleen Preservation during Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy - A Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Cracow, Poland.

Department of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):497-503. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001309.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001309
PMID:39028110
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spleen preservation during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) should be pursued if safe and oncologically justified. The aim of the presented study was to compare surgical outcomes and identify risk factors for unplanned splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and evaluate short and long-terms outcomes.

METHODS

The following study is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, with the intention of preserving the spleen, for benign tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas between August 2012 and December 2022. Follow-up for patients' survival was completed in January 2023. In all, 106 patients were in total included in this study. Median age was 58 (41 to 67) years. The study population included 29 males (27.4%) and 77 females (72.6%).

RESULTS

Spleen preservation was possible in 67 (63.2%) patients. The tumor size was larger in the splenectomy group (respectively, 30 (16.5 to 49) vs. 15 (11 to 25); P <0.001). Overall, serious postoperative morbidity was 13.4% in the LSPDP group and 20.5% in the second group ( P =0.494). There were no perioperative deaths. The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate was 18% in the splenectomy group and 14.9% in the LSPDP group, while B and C fistulas were diagnosed in 15.4% and 10.5% of patients, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model, tumor size >3 cm was found to independently increase odds for unplanned splenectomy (OR 8.41, 95%CI 2.89-24.46; standardized for BMI).

CONCLUSION

Unplanned splenectomy during the attempt of LSPDP does not increase the risk for postoperative morbidity and postoperative pancreatic fistula. The independent risk factor for unplanned splenectomy during LSPDP is tumor size above 3 cm.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(LSPDP)时如果安全且符合肿瘤学要求,应保留脾脏。本研究的目的是比较手术结果,确定腹腔镜胰体尾切除术时计划外脾切除术的危险因素,并评估短期和长期结果。

方法

本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 2012 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月期间因胰腺体尾部良性肿瘤行腹腔镜胰体尾切除术且有保留脾脏意愿的连续患者。截至 2023 年 1 月,完成了患者生存随访。共纳入 106 例患者。中位年龄为 58(41 至 67)岁。研究人群包括 29 名男性(27.4%)和 77 名女性(72.6%)。

结果

67 例(63.2%)患者成功保留脾脏。脾切除术组的肿瘤更大(分别为 30(16.5 至 49)与 15(11 至 25);P<0.001)。总体而言,LSPDP 组的严重术后发病率为 13.4%,而第二组为 20.5%(P=0.494)。无围手术期死亡。脾切除术组的术后胰瘘发生率为 18%,LSPDP 组为 14.9%,分别有 15.4%和 10.5%的患者诊断为 B 和 C 型瘘。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,肿瘤大小>3cm 被发现是计划外脾切除术的独立危险因素(比值比 8.41,95%置信区间 2.89-24.46;标准化体重指数)。

结论

LSPDP 时计划外脾切除术不会增加术后发病率和术后胰瘘的风险。LSPDP 时计划外脾切除术的独立危险因素是肿瘤大小>3cm。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Factors Determining Spleen Preservation during Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy - A Cohort Study.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术保留脾脏相关因素的分析——一项队列研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):497-503. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001309.
2
Efficacy and safety of lateral approach laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.经侧方入路腹腔镜保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术的疗效与安全性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 6;15(1):28799. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10997-w.
3
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD011391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2.
4
Laparoscopic pancreatic enucleation: how far should we go for parenchyma preservation? A study by the French National Association of Surgery.腹腔镜胰腺摘除术:在实质保留方面我们应走多远?法国国家外科协会的一项研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1696-1708. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11453-y. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
Superiority of Robotic Over Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy With Warshaw Procedure for Reducing the Incidence of Postoperative Splenic Infarction.机器人辅助保脾胰远端切除术优于腹腔镜下 Warshaw 手术,可降低术后脾梗死发生率。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):472-478. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001289.
6
Benefit of splenectomy in distal pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine tumours: multicentre retrospective study.脾切除术在神经内分泌肿瘤胰体尾切除术中的益处:多中心回顾性研究
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf038.
7
Splenic vessel preservation versus Warshaw's technique during spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术中脾血管保留与华氏技术的比较:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):183-91. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1273-3. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
8
Minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: Does splenic vessel preservation have better postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术:保留脾血管是否具有更好的术后结局?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2015 Aug;14(4):346-53. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(15)60399-x.
9
A classification of laparoscopic central pancreatectomy determined on the basis of anatomical landmarks in 109 patients.基于109例患者的解剖标志对腹腔镜胰体尾切除术进行的分类。
Surgery. 2025 Jun 19;184:109442. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109442.
10
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术的比较:系统综述的比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):904-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2016-3. Epub 2011 Nov 15.