Departments of Pathology.
Department of Pathology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2024 Oct 1;48(10):1293-1301. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002282. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
Differences in risk factors (RF) of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognosis between submucosal early gastric cardiac (SEGCC) and noncardiac (SEGNCC) carcinomas remain unclear. In this study, we investigated and compared RF of LNM and prognosis in 891 patients with radical gastrectomy for SEGCC (n=217) or SEGNCC (n=674). Compared with SEGNCC, SEGCC displayed significantly higher proportion of elderly patients (70 y or above), the elevated macroscopic type, well/moderately differentiated tubular and low-grade papillary adenocarcinomas, as well as low-grade tumor budding, but lower prevalence of the depressed macroscopic type, poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, mixed adenocarcinoma, poorly cohesive carcinoma, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, and high-grade tumor budding. By univariate analysis, significant RF for LNM of the cohort included female sex, poor differentiation, SM2 invasion, LVI, intermediate-grade and high-grade tumor budding, whereas tumor size, histology type, and perineural invasion were the significant RF for LNM in SEGNCC. By multivariate analysis, significant independent RF for LNM included female sex and LVI in SEGCC but were female sex, mixed adenocarcinoma, LVI, and high-grade tumor budding in SEGNCC. The 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in SEGCC than in SEGNCC for patients with LNM, but not for those without. For overall survival, LNM was the only significant independent RF in SEGCC, whereas age 70 years or above and LNM were independent RF in SEGNCC. The results of our study provided the clinicopathologic evidence for individualized clinical management strategies for these 2 groups of patients and suggested different pathogenesis mechanisms between SEGCC and SEGNCC.
胃黏膜内腺癌(SEGCC)和非胃黏膜内腺癌(SEGNCC)的淋巴结转移(LNM)危险因素(RF)和预后存在差异,但仍不清楚。本研究通过对 891 例行根治性胃切除术的 SEGCC(n=217)和 SEGNCC(n=674)患者进行调查和比较,研究了 LNM 的 RF 和预后。与 SEGNCC 相比,SEGCC 患者中高龄(70 岁或以上)、隆起型、高分化管状和低级别乳头状腺癌以及低级别肿瘤芽生的比例较高,而凹陷型、低分化管状腺癌、混合性腺癌、低黏附性癌、淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)、神经周围侵犯和高级别肿瘤芽生的比例较低。单因素分析显示,该队列中 LNM 的显著 RF 包括女性、低分化、SM2 浸润、LVI、中高级别肿瘤芽生,而肿瘤大小、组织学类型和神经周围侵犯是 SEGNCC 中 LNM 的显著 RF。多因素分析显示,SEGCC 中 LNM 的独立显著 RF 包括女性和 LVI,但在 SEGNCC 中则为女性、混合性腺癌、LVI 和高级别肿瘤芽生。LNM 患者的 5 年总生存率在 SEGCC 中明显低于 SEGNCC,但无 LNM 患者则不然。对于总生存率,LNM 是 SEGCC 中唯一的独立显著 RF,而年龄 70 岁或以上和 LNM 是 SEGNCC 的独立 RF。本研究结果为这两组患者提供了个体化临床管理策略的临床病理证据,并提示 SEGCC 和 SEGNCC 之间存在不同的发病机制。