• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估ESR-iGuide决策支持工具在优化CT成像转诊适宜性方面的准确性和影响。

Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of the ESR-iGuide Decision Support Tool in Optimizing CT Imaging Referral Appropriateness.

作者信息

Luxenburg Osnat, Vaknin Sharona, Wilf-Miron Rachel, Saban Mor

机构信息

Medical Technology, Health Information and Research Directorate, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.

The Gertner Institute for Health Policy and Epidemiology, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

出版信息

J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Feb;38(1):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01197-5. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10278-024-01197-5
PMID:39028357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11811312/
Abstract

Radiology referral quality impacts patient care, yet factors influencing quality are poorly understood. This study assessed the quality of computed tomography (CT) referrals, identified associated characteristics, and evaluated the ESR-iGuide clinical decision support tool's ability to optimize referrals. A retrospective review analyzed 300 consecutive CT referrals from an acute care hospital. Referral quality was evaluated on a 5-point scale by three expert reviewers (inter-rater reliability κ = 0.763-0.97). The ESR-iGuide tool provided appropriateness scores and estimated radiation exposure levels for the actual referred exams and recommended exams. Scores were compared between actual and recommended exams. Associations between ESR-iGuide scores and referral characteristics, including the specialty of the ordering physician (surgical vs. non-surgical), were explored. Of the referrals, 67.1% were rated as appropriate. The most common exams were head and abdomen/pelvis CTs. The ESR-iGuide deemed 70% of the actual referrals "usually appropriate" and found that the recommended exams had lower estimated radiation exposure compared to the actual exams. Logistic regression analysis showed that non-surgical physicians were more likely to order inappropriate exams compared to surgical physicians. Over one-third of the referrals showed suboptimal quality in the unstructured system. The ESR-iGuide clinical decision support tool identified opportunities to optimize appropriateness and reduce radiation exposure. Implementation of such a tool warrants consideration to improve communication and maximize patient care quality.

摘要

放射学转诊质量影响患者护理,但影响质量的因素却知之甚少。本研究评估了计算机断层扫描(CT)转诊的质量,确定了相关特征,并评估了ESR-iGuide临床决策支持工具优化转诊的能力。一项回顾性研究分析了一家急症医院连续300例CT转诊病例。由三位专家评审员以5分制对转诊质量进行评估(评分者间信度κ = 0.763 - 0.97)。ESR-iGuide工具为实际转诊的检查和推荐的检查提供了适宜性评分和估计的辐射暴露水平。比较了实际检查和推荐检查的评分。探讨了ESR-iGuide评分与转诊特征之间的关联,包括开单医生的专业(外科与非外科)。在这些转诊病例中,67.1%被评为适宜。最常见的检查是头部和腹部/盆腔CT。ESR-iGuide认为70%的实际转诊“通常适宜”,并发现推荐的检查相比实际检查估计的辐射暴露更低。逻辑回归分析表明,与外科医生相比,非外科医生开出不适当检查的可能性更大。在非结构化系统中,超过三分之一的转诊显示质量欠佳。ESR-iGuide临床决策支持工具发现了优化适宜性和减少辐射暴露的机会。考虑实施这样一种工具以改善沟通并最大限度提高患者护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8066/11811312/a7aa65fdf158/10278_2024_1197_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8066/11811312/f4141cd3c5d3/10278_2024_1197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8066/11811312/60cb971a697a/10278_2024_1197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8066/11811312/a7aa65fdf158/10278_2024_1197_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8066/11811312/f4141cd3c5d3/10278_2024_1197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8066/11811312/60cb971a697a/10278_2024_1197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8066/11811312/a7aa65fdf158/10278_2024_1197_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of the ESR-iGuide Decision Support Tool in Optimizing CT Imaging Referral Appropriateness.评估ESR-iGuide决策支持工具在优化CT成像转诊适宜性方面的准确性和影响。
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Feb;38(1):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01197-5. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Inappropriate CT examinations: how much, who and where? Insights from a clinical decision support system (CDSS) analysis.不适当的 CT 检查:有多少、谁和在哪里?来自临床决策支持系统 (CDSS) 分析的见解。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):7796-7804. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10136-x. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
3
Computed tomography referral guidelines adherence in Europe: insights from a seven-country audit.欧洲计算机断层扫描转诊指南的依从性:七国审计的见解
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar;35(3):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11083-x. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Evaluating the reliability of ChatGPT as a tool for imaging test referral: a comparative study with a clinical decision support system.评估 ChatGPT 作为影像检查转诊工具的可靠性:与临床决策支持系统的对比研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):2826-2837. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10230-0. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
5
Advancing acceptance: assessing acceptance of the ESR iGuide clinical decision support system for improved computed tomography test justification.推进接受度:评估对红细胞沉降率iGuide临床决策支持系统的接受度,以改善计算机断层扫描检查的合理性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 14;10:1234597. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1234597. eCollection 2023.
6
Does clinical decision support system promote expert consensus for appropriate imaging referrals? Chest-abdominal-pelvis CT as a case study.临床决策支持系统能否促进关于适当影像检查转诊的专家共识?以胸腹盆CT为例进行研究。
Insights Imaging. 2023 Mar 16;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01371-3.
7
Are referral guidelines for CT examinations addressing all clinical scenarios? A comparison of EURO-2000 Guidelines and ESR iGuide.CT 检查的转诊指南是否涵盖所有临床情况?对 EURO-2000 指南和 ESR iGuide 的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6605-6611. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07736-w. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Can ChatGPT and Gemini justify brain CT referrals? A comparative study with human experts and a custom prediction model.ChatGPT和Gemini能否证明脑部CT转诊的合理性?与人类专家和定制预测模型的比较研究。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2025 Feb 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41747-025-00569-y.
9
Machine learning and deep learning for classifying the justification of brain CT referrals.机器学习和深度学习在大脑 CT 转诊分类中的应用。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Dec;34(12):7944-7952. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10851-z. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
10
Using evidence-based imaging referral guidelines to facilitate appropriate imaging: Are they all the same?使用基于证据的影像转诊指南以促进合理的影像检查:它们都一样吗?
Eur J Radiol. 2025 Feb;183:111933. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111933. Epub 2025 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing acceptance: assessing acceptance of the ESR iGuide clinical decision support system for improved computed tomography test justification.推进接受度:评估对红细胞沉降率iGuide临床决策支持系统的接受度,以改善计算机断层扫描检查的合理性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 14;10:1234597. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1234597. eCollection 2023.
2
ChatGPT-4 Assistance in Optimizing Emergency Department Radiology Referrals and Imaging Selection.ChatGPT-4 在优化急诊科放射科转诊和影像选择方面的辅助作用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Oct;20(10):998-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
3
Does clinical decision support system promote expert consensus for appropriate imaging referrals? Chest-abdominal-pelvis CT as a case study.
临床决策支持系统能否促进关于适当影像检查转诊的专家共识?以胸腹盆CT为例进行研究。
Insights Imaging. 2023 Mar 16;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01371-3.
4
The value of referral information and assessment - a cross sectional study of radiographers' perceptions.转诊信息和评估的价值 - 放射技师感知的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08291-w.
5
Are we overusing abdominal computed tomography scans in young patients referred in an emergency for acute abdominal pain?对于因急性腹痛而在急诊就诊的年轻患者,我们是否过度使用腹部计算机断层扫描?
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Mar 25;87:e187-e193. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.115126. eCollection 2022.
6
The justification of non-obstetric ultrasound referrals: A safe and effective practice.非产科超声检查转诊的合理性:一种安全有效的做法。
Ultrasound. 2022 Feb;30(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/1742271X211005510. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
7
Cancer risk following low doses of ionising radiation - Current epidemiological evidence and implications for radiological protection.低剂量电离辐射致癌风险——当前的流行病学证据及其对放射防护的影响。
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2022 Jan;873:503436. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503436. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
8
Clinical decision support system recommendations: how often do radiologists and clinicians accept them?临床决策支持系统推荐意见:放射科医生和临床医生接受的频率有多高?
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):4218-4224. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08479-4. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Referral guidelines for medical imaging in children: an ESR-EuroSafe Imaging survey on availability, awareness and use in clinical practice among European radiologists.儿童医学影像学转诊指南:ESR-欧洲放射安全成像调查研究在欧洲放射科医生临床实践中的可用性、知晓率和使用情况。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7984-7991. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07906-w. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
10
Requests for radiologic imaging: Prevalence and determinants of inadequate quality according to RI-RADS.根据 RI-RADS,放射影像学检查请求:不足质量的流行率和决定因素。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Apr;137:109615. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109615. Epub 2021 Feb 25.