• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通以及使用多靶点粪便DNA检测完成结直肠癌筛查
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Feb;40(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02479-w. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
2
Provider communication contributes to colorectal cancer screening intention through improving screening outcome expectancies and perceived behavioral control.提供者沟通通过提高筛查结果预期和感知行为控制,有助于结直肠癌筛查意愿。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116397. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116397. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
3
Alaska Native Patient and Provider Perspectives on the Multitarget Stool DNA Test Compared With Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.阿拉斯加原住民患者和医疗服务提供者对多靶点粪便DNA检测与结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的看法。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719884295. doi: 10.1177/2150132719884295.
4
Real-World Adherence to Multi-Target Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Among Asian Americans.亚裔美国人对结直肠癌多靶点粪便DNA检测的真实世界依从性
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251330695. doi: 10.1177/10732748251330695. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
5
National Survey of Patient Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences.全国性调查:影响结直肠癌筛查偏好的患者因素。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 May;14(5):603-614. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0524. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
Cross-sectional adherence with the multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in a large, nationally insured cohort.一项大型全国性保险队列研究中多靶点粪便 DNA 检测用于结直肠癌筛查的横断面依从性。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;36(11):2471-2480. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03956-0. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Estimated impact and value of blood-based colorectal cancer screening at varied adherence compared with stool-based screening.与基于粪便的筛查相比,不同依从性的基于血液的结直肠癌筛查的估计影响和价值。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):746-753. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2349467. Epub 2024 May 13.
8
Evaluation of a Tailored Patient Navigation Program for Improving Multitarget Stool DNA Test Adherence.评估定制化患者导航计划对提高多靶点粪便DNA检测依从性的效果
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):935-940. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09201-y. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
9
Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.利用 CRC-AIM 微观模拟模型估计基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查比较效果的差异依从性影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244431. eCollection 2020.
10
Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening.与结直肠癌筛查相关的医疗保健成本、资源利用和生产力损失。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):843-852. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2220965. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to multi-target stool DNA colorectal cancer screening and clinical follow-up in the Hartford HealthCare system.哈特福德医疗保健系统中多靶点粪便DNA结肠癌筛查及临床随访的依从性
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Sep 16;40(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04997-5.
2
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Modalities among Patients seen at Federally Qualified Health Centers Funded by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration.在美国卫生资源与服务管理局资助的联邦合格健康中心就诊患者中,结直肠癌筛查的预测因素及筛查方式
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Jan 16;50:102976. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.102976. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
2
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: National cancer statistics.国家癌症报告:癌症统计数据 1. 全国癌症统计数据概览
Cancer. 2022 Dec 15;128(24):4251-4284. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34479. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
4
Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review.美国农村地区结直肠癌筛查的障碍:一项系统综述
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Aug;19(3):5181. doi: 10.22605/RRH5181. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估旨在提高美国结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637.
6
Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.美国癌症筛查的模式和趋势。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 26;15:E97. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465.
7
From guideline to practice: New shared decision-making tools for colorectal cancer screening from the American Cancer Society.从指南到实践:美国癌症协会推出的用于结直肠癌筛查的新型共同决策工具
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):246-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21459. Epub 2018 May 30.
8
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Patient Decision Aids to Engage Adults in Treatment or Screening Decisions.患者决策辅助工具,以促使成年人参与治疗或筛查决策。
JAMA. 2017 Aug 15;318(7):657-658. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.10289.
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查:美国多学会专家组关于结直肠癌筛查的医师和患者建议。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):307-323. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通以及使用多靶点粪便DNA检测完成结直肠癌筛查

Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.

作者信息

Zhu Xuan, Squiers Linda, Madson Gabriel, Helmueller Leah, Southwell Brian G, Alam Shama, Finney Rutten Lila J

机构信息

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2025 Feb;40(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02479-w. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-024-02479-w
PMID:39031303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11846718/
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening continues to be underutilized in the USA despite the availability of multiple effective, guideline-recommended screening options. Provider recommendation has been consistently shown to improve screening completion. Understanding how patient-provider communication influences CRC screening can inform interventions to improve screening completion. We developed a behavioral theory-informed survey to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening completion. The survey was administered by RTI International between 03/2022 and 06/2022 to a sample of US adults ages 45-75 who received a valid order for mt-sDNA screening with a shipping date between 5/2021 and 9/2021. Respondents completed an electronic or paper survey. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with mt-sDNA test completion. A total of 2973 participants completed the survey (response rate, 21.7%) and 81.6% of them (n = 2427) reported having had a conversation with provider about mt-sDNA testing before the test was ordered. Having a conversation with the provider about the test, including discussions about costs, the need for follow-up testing and test instructions were associated with higher odds of test completion and being "very likely" to use the test in the future. Lack of discussion about advantages and disadvantages of available CRC screening options and lack of patient involvement in CRC screening decision-making were associated with reduced odds of test completion and likelihood of future use. Healthcare providers play a key role in patient adherence to CRC screening and must be appropriately prepared and resourced to educate and to engage patients in shared decision-making about CRC screening.

摘要

尽管美国有多种有效且符合指南推荐的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查选项,但CRC筛查的利用率仍然很低。一直以来,医生的建议被证明能提高筛查的完成率。了解医患沟通如何影响CRC筛查,可为提高筛查完成率的干预措施提供参考。我们开展了一项基于行为理论的调查,以确定与多靶点粪便DNA(mt-sDNA)筛查完成相关的医患沟通因素。RTI国际组织在2022年3月至2022年6月期间,对年龄在45 - 75岁之间、收到mt-sDNA筛查有效订单且发货日期在2021年5月至2021年9月之间的美国成年人样本进行了该调查。受访者完成了电子或纸质调查。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与mt-sDNA检测完成相关的医患沟通因素。共有2973名参与者完成了调查(回复率为21.7%),其中81.6%(n = 2427)报告在订购检测之前与医生就mt-sDNA检测进行过交谈。与医生就检测进行交谈,包括讨论费用、后续检测的必要性和检测说明,与更高的检测完成几率以及未来“非常有可能”使用该检测相关。缺乏对现有CRC筛查选项优缺点的讨论以及患者未参与CRC筛查决策,与检测完成几率降低和未来使用可能性降低相关。医疗保健提供者在患者坚持CRC筛查方面起着关键作用,必须做好充分准备并配备资源,以便对患者进行教育,并促使患者参与CRC筛查的共同决策。