Redwood Diana G, Blake Ian D, Provost Ellen M, Kisiel John B, Sacco Frank D, Ahlquist David A
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719884295. doi: 10.1177/2150132719884295.
Alaska Native (AN) people have among the world's highest rate of colorectal cancer (CRC). We assessed perceptions of AN people and their health care providers of a new take-home multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard) relative to colonoscopy. Cross-sectional surveys of AN people aged 40 to 75 years (mailed) and providers (online). Participants included 1616 AN patients (19% response rate) and 87 providers (26% response rate; 57% AN people). Over half (58%) of patients preferred colonoscopy for CRC screening, while 36% preferred MT-sDNA. Unscreened patients were significantly more likely to state a preference for MT-sDNA than previously screened patients (42% vs 31%, < .05) as were younger patients (<60 years old) compared with older patients (40% vs 30%, < .05). Most providers thought that MT-sDNA would improve screening rates (69%), would recommend if available (79%), and be implementable (79%). Perceived barriers differed substantially between patients and providers in both type and magnitude. Leading colonoscopy barriers reported by patients were travel (44%) and bowel preparation (40%), while providers thought that fear of pain (92%) and invasiveness of the test (87%) were the primary barriers. For MT-sDNA, patients' belief that colonoscopy was better (56%) and not knowing how to do the test (40%) were primary barriers, while providers thought stool collection (67%) and having a stool sample in their home (63%) were leading barriers. This study found that MT-sDNA has potential acceptability among AN people and their health care providers. Both groups reported a willingness to use MT-sDNA and did not perceive major barriers to its use. This preference was especially true of unscreened and younger patients. The majority of providers indicated they would use MT-sDNA if available and that it would improve CRC screening rates. In this population, where colonoscopy access is limited, MT-sDNA has the potential to improve CRC screening adherence.
阿拉斯加原住民(AN)的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率位居世界前列。我们评估了AN人群及其医疗服务提供者对一种新型的居家多靶点粪便DNA检测(MT-sDNA;Cologuard)相对于结肠镜检查的看法。对40至75岁的AN人群进行横断面邮寄调查,并对医疗服务提供者进行在线调查。参与者包括1616名AN患者(回复率19%)和87名医疗服务提供者(回复率26%;其中57%为AN人群)。超过一半(58%)的患者更喜欢结肠镜检查用于CRC筛查,而36%的患者更喜欢MT-sDNA。未接受筛查的患者比之前接受过筛查的患者更有可能表示倾向于MT-sDNA(42%对31%,P<0.05),与老年患者(60岁及以上)相比,年轻患者(<60岁)也是如此(40%对30%,P<0.05)。大多数医疗服务提供者认为MT-sDNA会提高筛查率(69%),如果有条件会推荐使用(79%),并且是可实施的(79%)。患者和医疗服务提供者在感知到的障碍的类型和程度上存在很大差异。患者报告的结肠镜检查的主要障碍是出行(44%)和肠道准备(40%),而医疗服务提供者认为对疼痛的恐惧(92%)和检查的侵入性(87%)是主要障碍。对于MT-sDNA,患者认为结肠镜检查更好(56%)以及不知道如何进行检测(40%)是主要障碍,而医疗服务提供者认为粪便采集(67%)和家中有粪便样本(63%)是主要障碍。这项研究发现MT-sDNA在AN人群及其医疗服务提供者中具有潜在的可接受性。两组都表示愿意使用MT-sDNA,并且没有察觉到使用它的主要障碍。这种偏好对于未接受筛查的患者和年轻患者尤其如此。大多数医疗服务提供者表示,如果有条件他们会使用MT-sDNA,并且它会提高CRC筛查率。在这个结肠镜检查机会有限的人群中,MT-sDNA有潜力提高CRC筛查的依从性。