Suppr超能文献

左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与地诺孕素治疗子宫腺肌病效果的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of the effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in the management of adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria; Reproductive Biology and Toxicology Research Laboratory, Oasis of Grace Hospital, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria.

Reproductive Biology and Toxicology Research Laboratory, Oasis of Grace Hospital, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Sep;300:230-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.038. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is a gynaecological lesion that impairs female fertility and contributes to reduced quality of life. There are several surgical and medical options for the management of this lesion; however, women who wish to conceive opt for medical therapies such as the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) and dienogest, which have various outcomes. To date, there is no consensus regarding which is more effective.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of LNG-IUS and dienogest for the management of adenomyosis, and explore the risk of occurrence of known side effects for both treatments.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effectiveness of LNG-IUS and dienogest for the management of adenomyosis.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PICO guidelines and EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Only clinical trials were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 792 studies that were initially identified, six were eligible for inclusion in this study. The studies included a total of 707 women; of these, 270 were treated with LNG-IUS, 354 were treated with dienogest, and 83 were controls. All the studies were from Asia (Bangladesh n = 1, China n = 2, India n = 1, Japan n = 1, South Korea n = 1). Dienogest was found to reduce pelvic pain significantly, evidenced by a lower visual analogue scale score, compared with LNG-IUS. Also, dienogest led to a significant reduction in uterine volume compared with LNG-IUS. However, subjects in the LNG-IUS group had significantly higher levels of haemoglobin than those in the dienogest group. Nonetheless, the occurrence of side effects such as weight gain, breast tenderness/distension, headache, insomnia/sleep disorder, depression/mood disorder, skin disorder/acne, and coital discomfort/reduced libido were comparable in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Dienogest may be more effective than LNG-IUS for the management of adenomyosis, as it shows a superior effect in the reduction of pelvic pain and uterine volume. As only six studies were included in the present meta-analysis due to the paucity of data in the literature, it is recommended that well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of dienogest with LNG-IUS should be conducted.

摘要

背景

子宫腺肌病是一种妇科病变,会损害女性生育能力并降低生活质量。对于这种病变有几种手术和医学治疗选择;但是,希望怀孕的女性会选择接受左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)和地诺孕素等医学治疗,这些治疗方法有不同的效果。迄今为止,对于哪种方法更有效尚无共识。

目的

比较 LNG-IUS 和地诺孕素治疗子宫腺肌病的效果,并探讨两种治疗方法已知副作用的发生风险。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析,旨在探索 LNG-IUS 和地诺孕素治疗子宫腺肌病的效果。

方法

根据 PICO 指南和 EMBASE、PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行文献检索。仅收集和分析临床试验。

结果

最初确定的 792 项研究中有 6 项符合纳入标准。这些研究共纳入 707 名女性;其中,270 名接受 LNG-IUS 治疗,354 名接受地诺孕素治疗,83 名作为对照组。所有研究均来自亚洲(孟加拉国 n=1、中国 n=2、印度 n=1、日本 n=1、韩国 n=1)。与 LNG-IUS 相比,地诺孕素治疗可显著减轻盆腔疼痛,表现在视觉模拟评分较低。此外,地诺孕素治疗还可显著降低子宫体积。然而,LNG-IUS 组的血红蛋白水平显著高于地诺孕素组。尽管如此,两组的副作用发生率(体重增加、乳房触痛/肿胀、头痛、失眠/睡眠障碍、抑郁/情绪障碍、皮肤疾病/痤疮和性交不适/性欲减退)相当。

结论

地诺孕素治疗子宫腺肌病的效果可能优于 LNG-IUS,因为它在减轻盆腔疼痛和子宫体积方面效果更好。由于文献中数据有限,本荟萃分析仅纳入了 6 项研究,因此建议开展设计良好的随机对照试验,比较地诺孕素与 LNG-IUS 的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验