Forbidden ion transport through cation exchange membranes.

Cation exchange membranes (CEMs) are widely used in many applications. The fixed anionic groups e.g., COO, -SO, etc. in the polymer matrix ideally allows the passage only of oppositely charged cations, driven by a potential or a concentration gradient. Anions, charged negative, the same as the membrane matrix, cannot pass through the membrane due to electrostatic repulsion. Such "Donnan-forbidden" passage can, however, occur to some degree, if the electrical or concentration gradient is high enough to overcome the "Donnan barrier". Except for salt uptake/transport in concentrated salt solutions, the factors that govern such Forbidden Ion Transport (FIT) have rarely been studied. In most applications of transmembrane ion transport, whether electrically driven as in electrodialysis, or concentration-driven, it is the transport of the counterion to the fixed charged groups, such as that of the proton through a CEM, that is usually of interest. Nevertheless, CEMs are also of interest in analytical chemistry, specifically in suppressed ion chromatography. As used in membrane suppressors, both transport of permitted ions and rejection of forbidden ions are important. If the latter is indeed governed by electrostatic factors, other things being equal, the primary governing factor should be the charge density of the membrane, tantamount to its ion exchange capacity (IEC). In fabricating microscale suppressors, we found useful to synthesize a new ion exchange polymer that can be easily molded to make tubular microconduits. Despite a high IEC of this material, FIT was also found to be surprisingly high. We measured several relevant properties for thirteen commercial and four custom-made membranes to discover that while FIT is indeed linearly related to 1/IEC for a significant number of these membranes, for very high water-content membranes, FIT may be overwhelmingly governed by the water content of the membrane. In addition, FIT through all CEMs differ greatly among strong acids, they may still be transported as the molecular acids and the extent is in the same order as the expected activity of the molecular acid in the CEM. These results are discussed with the perspective that even for strong acids, the transport does take place as un-ionized molecular acids.