• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赋能住院患者参与抗生素治疗的共同决策:一项定量分析。

Empowered hospitalized patients are involved in shared decision making on antibiotic therapy: a quantitative analysis.

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Population Medicine, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge (OCEAN), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Preventive and Population Medicine, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge (OCEAN), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2024 Sep;151:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.006
PMID:39032572
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Half of hospitalized patients receive antibiotics, but they are rarely involved in shared decision making (SDM) on antibiotic therapy. We sought to understand the association between patient empowerment and their involvement in SDM on antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

From March 2021 to April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey on hospitalized patients receiving antibiotic therapy for ≥1 day in a 1600-bed adult general hospital in Singapore. The questionnaire included seven items (five-point Likert scale) on involvement in SDM from SDM-Q-9 and 10 items (four-point Likert scale) on patient empowerment from HCEQ-10. A multi-variable logistic regression model was constructed to assess for independent associations between the three constructs of patient empowerment and involvement in SDM on antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Of 636 hospitalized patients, mean age was 57.6 (SD 15.5) years, 61% were males and 37% had tertiary-level education. The majority (90%) were aware that they were on antibiotic therapy, but only 11% of them knew the name of the antibiotic given. After adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, educational level, and duration of hospital stay, patients with a high-level of involvement in decisions (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-6.01), interactions with healthcare professionals (AOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.03-3.02), and degree of control over their hospital care (AOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.15-3.12) were more likely to have a high-level of involvement in SDM on antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Empowering hospitalized patients with involvement in decisions, interactions with healthcare professionals, and control of their hospital care can increase their participation in SDM on antibiotic therapy in hospitals.

摘要

背景

一半的住院患者接受抗生素治疗,但他们很少参与抗生素治疗的共同决策(SDM)。我们试图了解患者赋权与他们参与抗生素治疗 SDM 的关联。

方法

从 2021 年 3 月到 2022 年 4 月,我们在新加坡一家拥有 1600 张床位的成人综合医院对接受抗生素治疗至少 1 天的住院患者进行了一项横断面调查。问卷包括 SDM-Q-9 中的 7 个项目(5 分李克特量表)和 HCEQ-10 中的 10 个项目(4 分李克特量表),涉及患者参与 SDM 和患者赋权。构建多变量逻辑回归模型,以评估患者赋权的三个结构与抗生素治疗 SDM 之间的独立关联。

结果

在 636 名住院患者中,平均年龄为 57.6(15.5)岁,61%为男性,37%具有高等教育水平。大多数(90%)患者知道自己正在接受抗生素治疗,但只有 11%的患者知道所给抗生素的名称。调整年龄、性别、种族、教育水平和住院时间后,参与决策程度较高的患者(调整后的优势比(AOR)3.63,95%置信区间(CI)2.19-6.01)、与医疗保健专业人员互动(AOR 1.77,95%CI 1.03-3.02)和对其医院护理的控制程度(AOR 1.90,95%CI 1.15-3.12)更有可能高度参与抗生素治疗的 SDM。

结论

赋予住院患者参与决策、与医疗保健专业人员互动以及控制其医院护理的权力,可以提高他们在医院参与抗生素治疗 SDM 的程度。

相似文献

1
Empowered hospitalized patients are involved in shared decision making on antibiotic therapy: a quantitative analysis.赋能住院患者参与抗生素治疗的共同决策:一项定量分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Sep;151:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Hospitalised patients as stewards of their own antibiotic therapy: a qualitative analysis informing the strategic design of interventions to encourage shared decision-making in tertiary hospital settings in Singapore.住院患者作为自身抗生素治疗的管理者:一项定性分析,为鼓励在新加坡三级医院环境中进行共享决策的干预措施的战略设计提供信息。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1347764. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347764. eCollection 2024.
3
Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.用于多发性硬化症共同决策的SDM-Q-9问卷的心理测量特性:项目反应理论建模与验证性因素分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 22;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2.
4
Racial Disparities in Shared Decision-Making and the Use of mHealth Technology Among Adults With Hypertension in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Study in the United States.种族差异在共享决策和使用移动医疗技术在高血压患者中的应用 2017-2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查:美国的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 13;25:e47566. doi: 10.2196/47566.
5
Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.匈牙利全国性调查中 9 项共享决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)的有效性和可靠性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01061-2. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Shared decision-making in the treatment of adolescents diagnosed with depression: A cross-sectional survey of mental health professionals in China.中国青少年抑郁症治疗中的共享决策:精神卫生专业人员的横断面调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):340-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Patient involvement in medical decisions: a survey of shared decision making during physical therapy consultations.患者参与医疗决策:物理治疗咨询期间共同决策的调查
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Apr;39(4):878-886. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2029653. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
8
Continuing professional education of Iranian healthcare professionals in shared decision-making: lessons learned.伊朗医疗保健专业人员在共同决策方面的继续职业教育:经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06233-6.
9
Exploring the shared decision making process of caesarean sections at a teaching hospital in Ghana: a mixed methods study.探讨加纳一所教学医院剖宫产的共同决策过程:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05739-7.
10
Characteristics of shared decision making in Romania from the patient perspective: A cross-sectional multicentric study.从患者角度看罗马尼亚的共享决策特征:一项跨中心的横断面研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1152-1159. doi: 10.1111/jep.13257. Epub 2019 Aug 12.