Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospitals, FMTS, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
Department of Public Health, Strasbourg University Hospital, FMTS, GMRC, 1 Avenue de l'hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Dec;110(8):103951. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103951. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
Companionship and simple experience or naive practice (NP) rarely lead to expert level surgery, in contrast to deliberate practice (DP) where an expert analyzes the learner's errors and sets goals to improve performance. The main hypothesis was that using DP for learning would result in faster and/or greater progress than using NP.
The objective of this work was to compare the evolution of the learning curve for clavicle locking plate placement on a sawbone model of a clavicle fracture, by surgical trainees learning via two different methods; NP and DP.
Ten surgical residents, divided into 2 groups of 5, each placed 6 plates. The 6 trials were filmed. The NP group saw an expert video before each placement. The DP group saw this video once and then received personalized advice from the expert for improvement, by analyzing their own video after each subsequent trial. Objective performance (OP) was measured by a standardized evaluation grid (OSATS, with a score ranging from 10 to 50 points per trial), self-evaluation of performance by a numerical scale (from 0 to 10) and stress by an analgesia-nociception index (ANI, calculated by heart rate recording, from 0 to 100).
The mean OP at the last trial of clavicle plate placement was 41.8 (NP group) and 48.2 (DP group), with a mean progression from the first to last trials of 0.8 in the NP group, and 5.1 in the DP group. The mean progression in self-evaluation between the first and last trials was 3.4 (NP group) and 4.6 (DP group). The mean progression of the ANI between the first and last trials was -4.5 (NP group) and +5 (DP group).
The results of learning a clavicle plate osteosynthesis technique measured by OSATS were better with deliberate practice than with naive practice. The progression in self-evaluated performance was better with deliberate practice, but with a higher stress level.
Deliberate practice is a technique for learning the surgical procedure which complements companionship and experience. It shortens the learning curve and improves the level of performance of surgical trainees.
IV; non-interventional research.
陪伴和简单的经验或幼稚的实践(NP)很少能导致专家级别的手术,而刻意练习(DP)则相反,在刻意练习中,专家会分析学习者的错误,并设定目标以提高表现。主要假设是,使用 DP 进行学习将比使用 NP 更快和/或更大程度地取得进展。
本工作的目的是比较使用两种不同方法(NP 和 DP)学习锁骨锁定板放置在锁骨骨折的模型上的学习曲线的演变,通过手术学员。
10 名外科住院医师分为两组,每组放置 6 块板。拍摄了 6 次试验。NP 组在每次放置前观看专家视频。DP 组仅观看一次视频,然后通过分析每次后续试验后的自己的视频,从专家那里获得个性化的改进建议。客观表现(OP)通过标准化评估网格(OSATS 进行测量,每次试验得分为 10 到 50 分)、表现的自我评估(从 0 到 10)和通过心率记录计算的镇痛-疼痛指数(ANI,从 0 到 100)。
锁骨板放置的最后一次试验的平均 OP 为 41.8(NP 组)和 48.2(DP 组),NP 组从第一次到最后一次试验的平均进展为 0.8,DP 组为 5.1。NP 组第一次到最后一次试验的自我评估的平均进展为 3.4,DP 组为 4.6。NP 组第一次到最后一次试验的 ANI 的平均进展为-4.5,DP 组为+5。
通过 OSATS 测量,使用 DP 学习锁骨板骨合成技术的结果优于使用 NP。使用 DP 进行自我评估的表现进展更好,但压力水平更高。
刻意练习是一种学习手术程序的技术,它补充了陪伴和经验。它缩短了学习曲线,提高了手术学员的表现水平。
IV;非干预性研究。