Suppr超能文献

脊髓刺激模式与实验性疼痛性糖尿病多发性神经病变中神经性疼痛行为的缓解

Spinal Cord Stimulation Paradigms and Alleviation of Neuropathic Pain Behavior in Experimental Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy.

作者信息

de Geus Thomas J, Franken Glenn, Joosten Elbert A J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2024 Dec;27(8):1330-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.06.007. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an alternative treatment option for painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN). Differential target multiplexed (DTM)-SCS is proposed to be more effective than conventional (Con)-SCS. Animal studies are essential for understanding SCS mechanisms in PDPN pain relief. Although the Von Frey (VF) test is the gold standard for preclinical pain research, it has limitations. Operant testing using the conditioned place preference (CPP) test provides insights into spontaneous neuropathic pain relief and enhances the translatability of findings. This study aims to 1) use the CPP test to evaluate Con- and DTM-SCS effects on spontaneous neuropathic pain relief in PDPN animals and 2) investigate the correlation between mechanical hypersensitivity alleviation and spontaneous neuropathic pain relief.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Diabetes was induced through streptozotocin injection in 32 rats; 16 animals developed PDPN and were implanted with a quadripolar lead. Rats were conditioned for Con-SCS (n = 8) or DTM-SCS (n = 7), and a preference score compared with sham was determined. After conditioning, a 30-minute SCS protocol was conducted. Mechanical sensitivity was assessed using VF before, during, and after SCS.

RESULTS

There were no significant chamber preference changes for DTM-SCS (p = 0.3449) or Con-SCS (p = 0.3632). Subgroups of responders and nonresponders were identified with significant increases in preference score for responders for both DTM-SCS (-266.6 to 119.8; p = 0.0238; n = 4) and Con-SCS (-350.7 to 88.46; p = 0.0148; n = 3). No strong correlation between SCS-induced spontaneous neuropathic pain relief and effects on mechanical hypersensitivity in PDPN animals is noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPP test is a valuable tool to test the efficacy of the pain-relieving potential of various SCS paradigms in PDPN animals. The results of this study show no differences in spontaneous neuropathic pain relief between DTM- and Con-SCS in PDPN animals. Furthermore, there is no correlation between the effect of SCS in spontaneous pain relief and hind paw mechanical hypersensitivity.

摘要

目的

脊髓刺激(SCS)是疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(PDPN)的一种替代治疗选择。提出差异靶点多路复用(DTM)-SCS比传统(Con)-SCS更有效。动物研究对于理解SCS缓解PDPN疼痛的机制至关重要。尽管von Frey(VF)测试是临床前疼痛研究的金标准,但它有局限性。使用条件性位置偏爱(CPP)测试的操作性测试可深入了解自发性神经病理性疼痛的缓解情况,并提高研究结果的可转化性。本研究旨在:1)使用CPP测试评估Con-SCS和DTM-SCS对PDPN动物自发性神经病理性疼痛缓解的影响;2)研究机械性超敏反应减轻与自发性神经病理性疼痛缓解之间的相关性。

材料与方法

通过向32只大鼠注射链脲佐菌素诱导糖尿病;16只动物发生PDPN并植入四极导联。对大鼠进行Con-SCS(n = 8)或DTM-SCS(n = 7)条件设定,并确定与假手术组相比的偏爱分数。条件设定后,进行30分钟的SCS方案。在SCS之前、期间和之后,使用VF评估机械敏感性。

结果

DTM-SCS(p = 0.3449)或Con-SCS(p = 0.3632)组均无明显的箱体偏爱变化。确定了反应者和无反应者亚组,DTM-SCS(-266.6至119.8;p = 0.0238;n = 4)和Con-SCS(-350.7至88.46;p = 0.0148;n = 3)的反应者偏爱分数均显著增加。未发现SCS诱导的PDPN动物自发性神经病理性疼痛缓解与对机械性超敏反应的影响之间有强相关性。

结论

CPP测试是测试各种SCS模式在PDPN动物中缓解疼痛潜力疗效的有价值工具。本研究结果表明,DTM-SCS和Con-SCS在PDPN动物自发性神经病理性疼痛缓解方面无差异。此外,SCS在自发性疼痛缓解中的作用与后爪机械性超敏反应之间无相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验