Suppr超能文献

关节镜下盘状半月板成形术治疗膝关节盘状半月板的临床疗效及随访研究。

Clinical efficacy and pain follow-up after arthroscopic discoid meniscoplasty of the knee: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, 1327 Juzi Street, Yanji City, Jilin Province, 133000, P.R. China.

Department of Operating Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University, Yanji City, Jilin Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 22;25(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07683-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the viability and efficiency of performing arthroscopic meniscoplasty in treating discoid meniscus (DM) in the knee joint.

METHODS

A total of 29 patients diagnosed with symptomatic lateral DM between October 2014 and December 2019 were included in the study. Among them, 7 patients with intact DM underwent arthroscopic discoid meniscoplasty (group A), while 22 patients with torn DM received arthroscopic DM plasty along with repair and suturing (group B). Both Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Lysholm score assessments were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULT

The favorable and acceptable outcome rate was 85.71% in group A and 95.45% in group B (P > 0.05). The VAS scores post-operatively at each follow-up time point were consistently lower compared to pre-operative values, while the Lysholm knee function scores showed improvement. There were no significant differences in VAS score and Lysholm score between group A and group B at different stages (P > 0.05). Both surgical techniques (discoid meniscoplasty and discoid meniscoplasty combined with repair and suture) showed significant improvement in postoperative VAS score and Lysholm score, but there was no difference in outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the two surgical techniques studied in this study (discoid meniscoplasty and discoid meniscoplasty combined with repair and suture) produced similar results in terms of pain reduction and improved knee function.

摘要

背景

评估关节镜下半月板成形术治疗膝关节盘状半月板(DM)的可行性和效率。

方法

本研究纳入了 2014 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月期间诊断为外侧 DM 症状性的 29 例患者。其中,7 例完整的 DM 患者接受了关节镜下盘状半月板成形术(A 组),22 例撕裂的 DM 患者接受了关节镜下 DM 成形术联合修复和缝合(B 组)。两组患者术前和术后均进行视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和 Lysholm 评分评估。

结果

A 组的优良率和可接受率为 85.71%,B 组为 95.45%(P>0.05)。术后各随访时间点的 VAS 评分均明显低于术前,Lysholm 膝关节功能评分均有所改善。A 组和 B 组在不同阶段的 VAS 评分和 Lysholm 评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。两种手术技术(盘状半月板成形术和盘状半月板成形术联合修复和缝合)术后 VAS 评分和 Lysholm 评分均显著改善,但两组间疗效无差异。

结论

总的来说,本研究中研究的两种手术技术(盘状半月板成形术和盘状半月板成形术联合修复和缝合)在减轻疼痛和改善膝关节功能方面均取得了相似的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a68/11265089/852e0f0f8d25/12891_2024_7683_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验