Suppr超能文献

农村地区非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝药的使用情况。

Oral anticoagulation use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in rural setting.

作者信息

Brod Camille, Groth Nicole, Rudeck Macaela, Artang Ramin, Rioux Matthew, Benziger Catherine

机构信息

University of Minnesota Medical School - Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN, United States.

Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, MN, United States.

出版信息

Am J Med Open. 2022 Oct 13;9:100026. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100026. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines established direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as first line therapy over warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Ambulatory clinic patients with non-valvular AF or atrial flutter seen between 10/1/2019-7/12/2020 included. High-risk AF defined as males CHADS-VASc score ≥2 and females ≥3. Patients were separated into: warfarin, DOAC, or no oral anticoagulation (OAC). ATRIA bleed score calculated. A provider survey assessing knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation completed via REDCap between 3/5-4/16/2020.

RESULTS

Of 12,014 subjects with AF, 8,032 were high risk (mean age 75.9 ± 9.8 years; 57.5% male). There were 4,619 (57.1%) ≥ 75 years and 63.4% were rural dwelling. There was no significant difference between the number of subjects on anticoagulation before and after the guideline publication (75.6% vs. 75.7%,  = 0.79). Warfarin use decreased 2.3% over 1 year (39.3% to 37.0%), while DOACs increased 2.4% (36.2% to 38.7%,  < 0.001 for both). At 1-year, age, male gender, CHADS-VASc score 4-6, hypertension, stroke and cardiology consult increased prescription of OAC (p<0.05). Vascular disease, high risk ATRIA bleed, renal disease, prior hemorrhage, and left atrial appendage occlusion were associated with decreased OAC use ( < 0.05). Left atrial appendage occlusion device use was low (<1%). In a survey, majority of providers noted bleeding risk (35.1%) and cost (25.0%) to be the biggest barriers to DOAC use.

CONCLUSIONS

The new guidelines caused a slight increase in DOACs over time. Significant barriers to DOAC use exist in rural areas; one in four high risk AF patient remains without OAC therapy.

摘要

背景

2019年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)/美国心律学会(HRS)指南将直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)确立为非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)优于华法林的一线治疗药物。

方法

纳入2019年10月1日至2020年7月12日期间门诊就诊的非瓣膜性AF或心房扑动患者。高危AF定义为男性CHADS-VASc评分≥2分且女性≥3分。患者被分为:华法林组、DOAC组或无口服抗凝治疗(OAC)组。计算ATRIA出血评分。通过REDCap在2020年3月5日至4月16日期间完成一项评估抗凝知识和障碍的医疗服务提供者调查。

结果

在12014例AF患者中,8032例为高危患者(平均年龄75.9±9.8岁;男性占57.5%)。年龄≥75岁的患者有4619例(57.1%),63.4%居住在农村。指南发布前后接受抗凝治疗的患者数量无显著差异(75.6%对75.7%,P=0.79)。华法林的使用在1年内下降了2.3%(从39.3%降至37.0%),而DOACs的使用增加了2.4%(从36.2%增至38.7%,两者P均<0.001)。在1年时,年龄、男性、CHADS-VASc评分4 - 6分、高血压、中风和心脏病会诊增加了OAC的处方率(P<0.05)。血管疾病、高危ATRIA出血、肾脏疾病、既往出血和左心耳封堵与OAC使用减少相关(P<0.05)。左心耳封堵装置的使用率较低(<1%)。在一项调查中,大多数医疗服务提供者指出出血风险(35.1%)和成本(25.0%)是DOAC使用的最大障碍。

结论

随着时间的推移,新指南使DOACs的使用略有增加。农村地区DOAC使用存在重大障碍;四分之一的高危AF患者仍未接受OAC治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ad9/11256238/fb9f98ad6e22/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验