Jackson Emily
Law School, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
J Law Biosci. 2024 Jul 18;11(2):lsae016. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsae016. eCollection 2024 Jul-Dec.
One of this century's most dramatic scientific developments is the reprogramming of stem cells in order to create self-organizing embryo-like entities, known as stem cell based embryo models (SCBEMs). The science is moving very quickly, but if, as increasingly appears to be the case, scientists are capable of creating entities that are effectively indistinguishable from sperm and egg derived embryos, important legal questions arise. In countries like the UK, where a strict regulatory regime applies to research on embryos, should this be extended to SCBEM research, or would a different regulatory response be appropriate? Drawing on the 1984 Warnock Report, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and the latest guidelines from the International Society for Stem Cell Research, this article considers principles for the regulation of the creation and use of SCBEMs.
本世纪最引人注目的科学进展之一是对干细胞进行重新编程,以创造出自我组织的类胚胎实体,即基于干细胞的胚胎模型(SCBEMs)。科学发展日新月异,但如果科学家越来越有能力创造出与精卵来源的胚胎几乎无法区分的实体,就会引发重要的法律问题。在英国等对胚胎研究实行严格监管制度的国家,这种监管应否扩展至SCBEM研究,还是应采取不同的监管应对措施才合适?本文借鉴1984年的沃诺克报告、1990年的《人类受精与胚胎学法》以及国际干细胞研究学会的最新指南,探讨了规范SCBEMs创建和使用的原则。