Harel Brian T, Gattuso James J, Latzman Robert D, Maruff Paul, Scammell Thomas E, Plazzi Giuseppe
Neuroscience Therapeutic Area Unit, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sleep Adv. 2024 Jun 26;5(1):zpae043. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae043. eCollection 2024.
People with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) often report cognitive impairment which can be quite burdensome but is rarely evaluated in routine clinical practice. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the nature and magnitude of cognitive impairment in NT1, NT2, and IH in studies conducted from January 2000 to October 2022. We classified cognitive tests assessing memory, executive function, and attention by cognitive domain. Between-group differences were analyzed as standardized mean differences (Cohen's ), and Cohen's for individual tests were integrated according to cognitive domain and clinical disease group. Eighty-seven studies were screened for inclusion; 39 satisfied inclusion criteria, yielding 73 comparisons (): NT1, = 60; NT2, = 8; IH, = 5. Attention showed large impairment in people with NT1 ( = -0.90) and IH ( = -0.97), and moderate impairment in NT2 ( = -0.60). Executive function was moderately impaired in NT1 ( = -0.30) and NT2 ( = -0.38), and memory showed small impairments in NT1 ( = -0.33). A secondary meta-analysis identified sustained attention as the most impaired domain in NT1, NT2, and IH ( -0.5 to -1). These meta-analyses confirm that cognitive impairments are present in NT1, NT2, and IH, and provide quantitative confirmation of reports of cognitive difficulties made by patients and clinicians. These findings provide a basis for the future design of studies to determine whether cognitive impairments can improve with pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for narcolepsy and IH.
1型发作性睡病(NT1)、2型发作性睡病(NT2)和特发性嗜睡症(IH)患者常报告有认知障碍,这可能会给患者带来很大负担,但在常规临床实践中很少对其进行评估。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们评估了2000年1月至2022年10月期间开展的研究中NT1、NT2和IH患者认知障碍的性质和程度。我们根据认知领域对评估记忆、执行功能和注意力的认知测试进行了分类。组间差异分析采用标准化均数差(Cohen's d),并根据认知领域和临床疾病组对各个测试的Cohen's d进行整合。共筛选了87项研究以纳入分析;39项符合纳入标准,产生了73项比较(:NT1,n = 60;NT2,n = 8;IH,n = 5)。注意力方面,NT1患者(d = -0.90)和IH患者(d = -0.97)表现出严重损害,NT2患者表现为中度损害(d = -0.60)。执行功能在NT1患者(d = -0.30)和NT2患者(d = -0.38)中为中度受损,记忆在NT1患者中表现为轻度受损(d = -0.33)。一项二次荟萃分析确定持续注意力是NT1、NT2和IH中受损最严重的领域(d为 -0.5至 -1)。这些荟萃分析证实NT1、NT2和IH患者存在认知障碍,并为患者和临床医生关于认知困难的报告提供了定量证实。这些发现为未来设计研究以确定发作性睡病和IH的药物及非药物治疗是否能改善认知障碍提供了依据。