Chlud K, Pangerl S
Pharmatherapeutica. 1985;4(2):113-21.
A double-blind, crossover study was carried out in 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and tolerance of single evening doses of 1000 mg naproxen and 20 mg piroxicam. After an initial wash-out period of 1 week, patients received 4-weeks' treatment with one or other of the trial drugs and were then crossed over after a 1-week wash-out period to the alternative medication for a further 4 weeks. Objective assessments of disease activity and patients' and physician's assessments of therapeutic response were made at the end of each wash-out and active treatment period, and at the end of the trial patients and physician were asked to say which of the two active treatments was preferred. Forty-nine patients completed the 10-week trial; one patient discontinued the study while on piroxicam therapy because of side-effects. While both treatments proved effective, naproxen was statistically significantly better than piroxicam for total joint pain, grip strength, duration of morning stiffness, and overall therapeutic response. Naproxen also had a more rapid and more pronounced action than did piroxicam and was selected as the preferred drug by both patients and physicians. Patients taking naproxen reported slightly fewer side-effects than did those taking piroxicam.
对50例类风湿性关节炎患者进行了一项双盲交叉研究,以比较单剂晚间服用1000毫克萘普生和20毫克吡罗昔康的疗效及耐受性。在最初1周的洗脱期后,患者接受其中一种试验药物为期4周的治疗,然后在1周的洗脱期后交叉接受另一种药物治疗,为期4周。在每次洗脱期和积极治疗期结束时,对疾病活动进行客观评估,并让患者和医生对治疗反应进行评估,在试验结束时,询问患者和医生更喜欢两种积极治疗中的哪一种。49例患者完成了为期10周的试验;1例患者在接受吡罗昔康治疗时因副作用退出研究。虽然两种治疗均证明有效,但在缓解全关节疼痛、握力、晨僵持续时间及总体治疗反应方面,萘普生在统计学上显著优于吡罗昔康。萘普生比吡罗昔康起效更快、作用更显著,被患者和医生选为首选药物。服用萘普生的患者报告的副作用略少于服用吡罗昔康的患者。