Katena Nyaradzai Arster, Shamu Shepherd, Fana Golden Tafadzwa, Dewa Evans, Dombojena Admire, Rusakaniko Simbarashe
Global Public Health and Family Medicine Department, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine &Health Sciences.
Department of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Faculty of Medicine& Health Sciences.
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 10:2024.07.10.24310219. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.10.24310219.
Deploying community health workers (CHWs) is a vital strategy to improve health at a community level in low- and middle-income countries. Whilst there is substantial evidence on the effectiveness of CHWs interventions, there is a need for more research on the mechanisms through which these interventions work. Understanding the acceptability of these interventions is one way of assessing the mechanisms through which they work. This article examines the acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients based on the perspectives of the CHWs, community nurses and diabetes and hypertensive patients. A qualitative study was imbedded within a cluster randomized trial to assess the effectiveness community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 3 community health nurses and 15 diabetes and hypertension patients as well as 2 focus group discussions with CHWs. Data were analyzed manually using the thematic analysis method. There was consensus that the intervention had many benefits amongst CHWs and community nurses. However, among patients, there were mixed perceptions regarding the benefits of the intervention. The main challenges that were mentioned by CHWs include resistance to advice by patients, insufficient resources, and lack of acceptance at some of the patient's homes. All participants believed the intervention was acceptable. Our study provides vital information that should be considered in upscaling CHW led interventions.
部署社区卫生工作者(CHWs)是改善低收入和中等收入国家社区层面健康状况的一项重要战略。虽然有大量证据表明社区卫生工作者干预措施的有效性,但仍需要对这些干预措施的作用机制进行更多研究。了解这些干预措施的可接受性是评估其作用机制的一种方式。本文基于社区卫生工作者、社区护士以及糖尿病和高血压患者的视角,探讨了由社区卫生工作者主导的健康素养干预对高血压和糖尿病患者生活方式改变的可接受性。一项定性研究嵌入了一项整群随机试验,以评估在津巴布韦哈拉雷市由社区卫生工作者主导的健康素养干预对高血压和糖尿病患者生活方式改变的有效性。通过对3名社区卫生护士和15名糖尿病及高血压患者进行半结构化访谈以及与社区卫生工作者进行2次焦点小组讨论来收集数据。使用主题分析法对数据进行人工分析。社区卫生工作者和社区护士一致认为该干预有诸多益处。然而,在患者中,对该干预益处的看法不一。社区卫生工作者提到的主要挑战包括患者对建议的抵触、资源不足以及在一些患者家中不被接受。所有参与者都认为该干预是可接受的。我们的研究提供了在扩大由社区卫生工作者主导的干预措施规模时应考虑的重要信息。