Treanor Caroline, Gallagher Conor, Lenehan Warren, Gantly Hannah, Bolger Ciaran, Malone Ailish
National Neurosurgical Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Brain Spine. 2024 Jun 26;4:102853. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102853. eCollection 2024.
People with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) often experience diagnostic delay. This could lead to poorer outcomes, including disability.
Does the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) have clinical utility as an early detection tool for possible DCM?
This is a prospective study of consecutive adult patients, referred to a National Neurosurgical Centre with a neck problem. Assessing clinicians undertook standard clinical examination and calculated the mJOA score. A consultant radiologist independently reported radiological findings, after which the assessing clinician determined the diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of mJOA for DCM at various cut-points was statistically analysed using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves.
Of 201 patients (98 male, mean age 52.6 ± 13y) assessed over 13 months, 21 were diagnosed with DCM (prevalence 10.4%). Fifteen (71.4%) had a mJOA score classifying disease severity as mild, 4/21 (19%) had moderate disease and two (9.5%) had severe disease. A mJOA score ≤17 (cutpoint ≥1) showed sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 71% for the clinical diagnosis of DCM. mJOA score ≤16 (cutpoint ≥2) had sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 90%. The ROC area under the curve was 0.885 (95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 0.95). 87% of patients were correctly classified.
mJOA score ≤16 is 90% specific for a subsequent diagnosis of DCM in people with neck problems and has potential to be used as an early detection tool. Further research is needed to replicate these findings and establish feasibility and acceptability in primary care.
退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)患者常常经历诊断延迟。这可能导致包括残疾在内的更差预后。
改良日本骨科协会量表(mJOA)作为可能的DCM早期检测工具是否具有临床实用性?
这是一项对因颈部问题转诊至国家神经外科中心的成年连续患者的前瞻性研究。评估临床医生进行了标准临床检查并计算mJOA评分。一位放射科顾问医生独立报告影像学结果,之后评估临床医生确定诊断。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对不同切点的mJOA对DCM的敏感性和特异性进行统计学分析。
在13个月内评估的201例患者(98例男性,平均年龄52.6±13岁)中,21例被诊断为DCM(患病率10.4%)。15例(71.4%)的mJOA评分将疾病严重程度分类为轻度,4/21例(19%)为中度疾病,2例(9.5%)为重度疾病。mJOA评分≤17(切点≥1)对DCM临床诊断的敏感性为95%,特异性为71%。mJOA评分≤16(切点≥2)的敏感性为62%,特异性为90%。曲线下ROC面积为0.885(95%置信区间:0.82至0.95)。87%的患者被正确分类。
mJOA评分≤16对颈部问题患者后续诊断DCM的特异性为90%,有潜力用作早期检测工具。需要进一步研究来重复这些发现并确定在初级保健中的可行性和可接受性。