Polesiak Emilia, Makowska-Janusik Malgorzata, Drapala Jakub, Zagorska Malgorzata, Banasiewicz Marzena, Kozankiewicz Boleslaw, Kulszewicz-Bajer Irena, Pron Adam
Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland.
Faculty of Science and Technology, Jan Dlugosz University, Al. Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2024 Jul 31;26(30):20690-20700. doi: 10.1039/d4cp02322f.
Four donor-acceptor-donor compounds consisting of 9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine donors differently linked to a benzothiadiazole acceptor were designed using DFT calculations and synthesized, namely 4,7-bis(4-(9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine)phenyl)benzo[][1,2,5]thiadiazole (1), 4,7-bis(2,5-dimethyl-4-(9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine)phenyl)benzo[][1,2,5]thiadiazole (2), 4,7-bis(3,5-di(9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine)phenyl)benzo[][1,2,5]thiadiazole (3), and 4-(3,5-di(9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine)phenyl)-7-(thiophen-2-yl)benzo[][1,2,5]thiadiazole (4). As predicted theoretically, all studied compounds were electrochemically active both in the reduction as well as in the oxidation modes. They underwent one electron -reversible reduction. Oxidation of 1 and 2 involved a two electron process transforming them into dications and carrying out, in parallel, their dimerization. Oxidation of 3 and 4 resulted in their oligomerization (polymerization). The electrochemically determined ionisation potentials (IP) of 1-4 were similar, covering a narrow range of 5.28-5.33 eV and were consistent with DFT calculations. Larger differences were found for experimentally determined electron affinity (EA) values, being significantly lower for 2 (|EA| = 2.59 eV) as compared to 1, 3 and 4 whose |EA| values were higher by 0.15-0.25 eV, again consistent with DFT calculations. DFT calculations predict positive values of Δ(S-T) for all compounds in the range of 0.18 eV to 0.43 eV for 1, 3 and 4 and a significantly lower value for 2 (0.06 eV), indicating a possible RISC process in this case. DFT calculations of Δ(S-T) lead to negative and very small values for 2-4 implying a possible involvement of higher lying triplets in the generation of singlet excitons. The investigated derivatives exhibited fluorescence in the orange-red spectral range (550-770 nm) and were strongly dependent on the solvent polarity. The highest PLQY value of 37% was measured for 1 in toluene. The PLQY values significantly improved upon deoxygenation of the studied solutions. Solid state samples also exhibited higher PLQY values as compared to those determined for DCM solutions. These findings were rationalized by partial suppression of the vibrationally induced emission quenching in the solid state due to the intermolecular interaction confinement.
使用密度泛函理论(DFT)计算设计并合成了四种由9,9 - 二甲基 - 9,10 - 二氢吖啶供体与苯并噻二唑受体以不同方式连接而成的给体 - 受体 - 给体化合物,即4,7 - 双(4 - (9,9 - 二甲基 - 9,10 - 二氢吖啶)苯基)苯并[1,2,5]噻二唑(1)、4,7 - 双(2,5 - 二甲基 - 4 - (9,9 - 二甲基 - 9,10 - 二氢吖啶)苯基)苯并[1,2,5]噻二唑(2)、4,7 - 双(3,5 - 二(9,9 - 二甲基 - 9,10 - 二氢吖啶)苯基)苯并[1,2,5]噻二唑(3)和4 - (3,5 - 二(9,9 - 二甲基 - 9,10 - 二氢吖啶)苯基) - 7 - (噻吩 - 2 - 基)苯并[1,2,5]噻二唑(4)。如理论预测的那样,所有研究的化合物在还原和氧化模式下均具有电化学活性。它们经历单电子可逆还原。1和2的氧化涉及双电子过程,将它们转化为二价阳离子并同时进行二聚化。3和4的氧化导致它们的低聚(聚合)。通过电化学测定的1 - 4的电离势(IP)相似,范围狭窄,为5.28 - 5.33 eV,与DFT计算结果一致。实验测定的电子亲和势(EA)值差异较大,与1、3和4相比,2的|EA|值(|EA| = 2.59 eV)明显更低,1、3和4的|EA|值高0.15 - 0.25 eV,同样与DFT计算结果一致。DFT计算预测所有化合物的Δ(S - T)为正值,1、3和4的范围为0.18 eV至0.43 eV,2的值明显更低(0.06 eV),表明在这种情况下可能存在反向系间窜越(RISC)过程。DFT计算的Δ(S - T)对于2 - 4导致负值且非常小,这意味着在单线态激子的产生中可能涉及更高能级的三线态。所研究的衍生物在橙红色光谱范围(550 - 770 nm)内表现出荧光,并且强烈依赖于溶剂极性。在甲苯中,1的最高光致发光量子产率(PLQY)值为37%。在所研究溶液脱氧后,PLQY值显著提高。与二氯甲烷(DCM)溶液相比,固态样品也表现出更高的PLQY值。这些发现通过分子间相互作用限制对固态中振动诱导发射猝灭的部分抑制得到了合理的解释。