Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79# Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):5931-5945. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08805-8. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with radiotherapy (RT) alone for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with stage IV inoperable head and neck cancer (IV-HNC).
Elderly patients diagnosed with inoperable IV-HNC from 2010 to 2015 were identified using the SEER database. Then, we performed a 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis to reduce treatment selection bias, and the prognostic role of CRT was investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models. The main outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was cancer-specific survival (CSS).
A total of 3318 patients were enrolled, of whom 601 received RT alone and 2717 received CRT. Through PSM, 526 patients were successfully matched, and balances between the two treatment groups were reached. In the matched dataset, multivariable Cox analysis revealed that CRT was associated with better OS (HR = 0.580, P < 0.001) and CSS (HR = 0.586, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, subgroups of patients with IV-HNC (younger age, male sex, being married, black race, grade I-II, oral cavity site, T3-T4 stage, N0-N1 stage, M1 stage) were inclined to benefit more from CRT treatment. Furthermore, the survival benefit of CRT was more pronounced in patients aged 65 to 80 years, but was absent in patients aged 80 years or older.
This study indicated that CRT resulted in better survival than RT alone in elderly patients with inoperable IV-HNC, especially for those subpopulations that benefit more from CRT treatment.
本研究旨在比较放化疗(CRT)与单纯放疗(RT)治疗不可手术的晚期(IV 期)头颈部癌(IV-HNC)老年患者(≥65 岁)的疗效。
使用 SEER 数据库确定 2010 年至 2015 年间诊断为不可手术的 IV 期 HNC 的老年患者。然后,我们进行了 1:1 倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析以减少治疗选择偏倚,并通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析、对数秩检验和 Cox 比例风险模型来研究 CRT 的预后作用。主要结局是总生存期(OS),次要结局是癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。
共纳入 3318 例患者,其中 601 例接受 RT 单独治疗,2717 例接受 CRT。通过 PSM,成功匹配了 526 例患者,两组之间达到了平衡。在匹配数据集的多变量 Cox 分析中,CRT 与更好的 OS(HR=0.580,P<0.001)和 CSS(HR=0.586,P<0.001)相关。同时,IV-HNC 的亚组患者(年龄较小、男性、已婚、黑人、分级 I-II、口腔部位、T3-T4 期、N0-N1 期、M1 期)更倾向于从 CRT 治疗中获益。此外,CRT 的生存获益在 65 至 80 岁的患者中更为明显,但在 80 岁或以上的患者中不存在。
本研究表明,CRT 治疗不可手术的 IV 期 HNC 老年患者的生存获益优于 RT 单独治疗,特别是对那些更受益于 CRT 治疗的亚组患者。