• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

价值驱动型医疗保健策略对生物类似药采用的影响:新加坡的故事

Impact of Value-Driven Healthcare Strategies for Biosimilar Adoption: The Singapore Story.

作者信息

Tan She Hui, Goh Louise Gek Huang, Ong Benjamin Shao Kiat, Ng Darren Sze Guan, Lin Liang, Ng Raymond Chee Hui, Thong Bernard Yu-Hor, Ng Kwong

机构信息

Agency for Care Effectiveness (ACE), Ministry of Health, 16 College Road, College of Medicine Building, Singapore, 169854, Singapore.

Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Blvd, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Sep;8(5):679-688. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00491-w. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-024-00491-w
PMID:39042227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11362392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare sustainability is a global challenge. Various value-driven healthcare strategies have been implemented by Singapore's national health technology assessment (HTA) agency, the Agency for Care Effectiveness (ACE). Considering the high and growing expenditure on biologics, strategies have been implemented to drive the use of biosimilars. As Singapore has reached the 5-year mark since the subsidy listing of the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar infliximab, this review aimed to evaluate the impact of these strategies on the changes in adoption rates, utilisation, spending and cost savings for biosimilars in the public healthcare sector.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using aggregated drug utilisation data from all public healthcare institutions. Five monoclonal antibodies with biosimilars, namely infliximab, adalimumab, trastuzumab, rituximab and bevacizumab, were included in this study. The outcomes evaluated were the monthly trends for utilisation volume, proportion attributed to biosimilar use, and drug spending up to December 2022. The simulated cost savings associated with biosimilar adoption were also reported.

RESULTS

After subsidy implementation, an upward trend in biosimilar use and proportion attributed to biosimilar adoption was observed, while spending reduced substantially. The adoption rate of most biosimilars reached more than 95% within 1 year of listing. Drugs with more than one approved biosimilar brand at the time of subsidy listing reported substantial price reductions of over 80%. Overall, spending for the five monoclonal antibodies have significantly reduced after biosimilar subsidy listing, with an estimated cumulative cost savings of $136 million over 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Value-driven healthcare strategies implemented in Singapore's public healthcare institutions have contributed to high adoption rates of biosimilars and have improved affordable access through lower treatment costs. This in turn has led to significant cost savings to the healthcare system.

摘要

背景

医疗保健的可持续性是一项全球性挑战。新加坡国家卫生技术评估(HTA)机构——医疗成效机构(ACE)已实施了各种价值驱动型医疗保健策略。鉴于生物制剂的支出高昂且不断增长,已实施相关策略来推动生物类似药的使用。由于自首个单克隆抗体生物类似药英夫利昔单抗补贴上市以来,新加坡已达到5年期限,本综述旨在评估这些策略对公共医疗保健部门生物类似药的采用率、使用情况、支出和成本节约变化的影响。

方法

利用所有公共医疗机构的汇总药物使用数据进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。本研究纳入了五种有生物类似药的单克隆抗体,即英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、曲妥珠单抗、利妥昔单抗和贝伐单抗。评估的结果是截至2022年12月的使用量月度趋势、生物类似药使用所占比例以及药物支出。还报告了与采用生物类似药相关的模拟成本节约情况。

结果

补贴实施后,观察到生物类似药的使用及其在采用中所占比例呈上升趋势,而支出大幅下降。大多数生物类似药在上市1年内的采用率达到了95%以上。补贴上市时拥有一个以上获批生物类似药品牌的药物价格大幅降低了80%以上。总体而言,生物类似药补贴上市后,这五种单克隆抗体的支出显著减少,估计5年内累计成本节约1.36亿美元。

结论

新加坡公共医疗机构实施的价值驱动型医疗保健策略促使生物类似药的高采用率,并通过降低治疗成本改善了可负担性。这反过来又为医疗保健系统带来了显著的成本节约。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4945/11362392/f04abe2bb6e7/41669_2024_491_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4945/11362392/82d4a124b0e4/41669_2024_491_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4945/11362392/bcb719b39bbb/41669_2024_491_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4945/11362392/f04abe2bb6e7/41669_2024_491_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4945/11362392/82d4a124b0e4/41669_2024_491_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4945/11362392/bcb719b39bbb/41669_2024_491_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4945/11362392/f04abe2bb6e7/41669_2024_491_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Value-Driven Healthcare Strategies for Biosimilar Adoption: The Singapore Story.价值驱动型医疗保健策略对生物类似药采用的影响:新加坡的故事
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Sep;8(5):679-688. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00491-w. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Budget Impact Analysis of Biosimilar Products in Spain in the Period 2009-2019.2009 - 2019年西班牙生物类似药产品的预算影响分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Apr 9;14(4):348. doi: 10.3390/ph14040348.
3
Association of Generic Competition With Price Decreases in Physician-Administered Drugs and Estimated Price Decreases for Biosimilar Competition.医生管理药物的仿制药竞争与价格下降的关联,以及预计生物类似药竞争带来的价格下降。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133451. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33451.
4
Comparison of Utilization Trends between Biosimilars and Generics: Lessons from the Nationwide Claims Data in South Korea.比较生物类似药和仿制药的利用趋势:来自韩国全国索赔数据的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Aug;18(4):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00547-7.
5
The Impact of Introducing Successive Biosimilars on Changes in Prices of Adalimumab, Infliximab, and Trastuzumab-Polish Experiences.引入连续生物类似药对阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和曲妥珠单抗价格变化的影响。波兰的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6952. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136952.
6
Estimation of cost savings between 2011 and 2014 attributed to infliximab biosimilar in the South Korean healthcare market: real-world evidence using a nationwide database.2011年至2014年韩国医疗市场中因英夫利昔单抗生物类似药带来的成本节约估算:基于全国性数据库的真实世界证据
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Jun;21(6):1227-1236. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13295. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Drugs After Biosimilar Competition.生物类似药竞争后生物药的患者自付费用。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e235429. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5429.
8
Potential cost-savings from the use of the biosimilars filgrastim, infliximab and insulin glargine in Canada: a retrospective analysis.加拿大使用生物类似药(非格司亭、英夫利昔单抗和甘精胰岛素)的潜在成本节约:回顾性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4680-2.
9
Real-world evidence of a successful biosimilar adoption program.生物类似药成功应用项目的真实世界证据。
Future Oncol. 2022 May;18(16):1997-2006. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1584. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
10
Modelling the opportunity for cost-savings or patient access with biosimilar adalimumab and tocilizumab: a European perspective.用阿达木单抗和托珠单抗生物类似药模拟成本节约或患者可及性的机会:欧洲视角。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):952-962. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2379212. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of biosimilar CT-P16 and reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.生物类似药CT-P16与参照药贝伐单抗治疗转移性或复发性非小细胞肺癌患者的随机对照试验的长期结果
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2025 Jul 24;44:100970. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100970.
2
Modelling the potential financial impacts of expanding access to immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer.模拟扩大免疫检查点抑制剂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌单药治疗可及性的潜在财务影响。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 24;84:103261. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103261. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
EMA/HMA joint statement on the scientific rationale supporting interchangeability of biosimilar medicines in the EU.欧洲药品管理局/人用药品委员会关于支持欧盟生物类似药可互换性的科学依据的联合声明。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Nov;29(6):363. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003571.
2
Biosimilar strategic implementation at a large health system.大型医疗机构的生物类似药战略实施。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Feb 8;79(4):268-275. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab410.
3
Uptake of biosimilar trastuzumab in Denmark compared with other European countries: a comparative study and discussion of factors influencing implementation and uptake of biosimilars.
丹麦与其他欧洲国家生物类似药曲妥珠单抗的应用情况比较:一项比较研究及对影响生物类似药应用和采用的因素的讨论
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;77(10):1495-1501. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03155-4. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
The Biosimilar Landscape: An Overview of Regulatory Approvals by the EMA and FDA.生物类似药概况:欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的监管批准概述
Pharmaceutics. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):48. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010048.
5
European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part I-Improving Biosimilar Understanding and Adoption.欧洲利益相关方对生物类似药的认识:第一部分——提高对生物类似药的理解和采用。
BioDrugs. 2020 Dec;34(6):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00452-9.
6
Clinical and Regulatory Concerns of Biosimilars: A Review of Literature.生物类似药的临床和监管关注:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 11;17(16):5800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165800.
7
Uptake of Biosimilar Infliximab in the UK, France, Japan, and Korea: Budget Savings or Market Expansion Across Countries?英国、法国、日本和韩国生物类似药英夫利昔单抗的采用情况:各国的预算节省还是市场扩张?
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 9;11:970. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00970. eCollection 2020.
8
Physicians' perceptions of the uptake of biosimilars: a systematic review.医生对生物类似药采用情况的看法:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e034183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034183.
9
Biosimilars in the USA: Will New Efforts to Spur Approvals and Access Spur Uptake and Cost Savings?美国的生物类似药:刺激批准和可及性的新举措会促进其使用并节省成本吗?
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Feb;33(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40290-018-00262-z.
10
Comparison of Utilization Trends between Biosimilars and Generics: Lessons from the Nationwide Claims Data in South Korea.比较生物类似药和仿制药的利用趋势:来自韩国全国索赔数据的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Aug;18(4):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00547-7.