• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拒绝,还是接受?一项关于放射技师对诊断性 X 光片看法的研究。

To reject, or to accept? A study on radiographers' perspectives on diagnostic radiographs.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore Singapore.

Department of Radiology, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore Singapore.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;55(4):101720. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101720. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101720
PMID:39042955
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The overall reject rate (RR) of our newly set up Radiology department was an average of 14%, higher than the recommended 8% target and 10% threshold set by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). An analysis done to identify potential causes of a high RR suggested that radiographers might have been rejecting images of diagnostic value. A lack of consistency in the definition of a diagnostic value image amongst radiographers may be a possible cause in the higher overall RR. This study aims to investigate potential discrepancies among radiographers in defining a diagnostic radiograph.

METHODS

An online survey composed of an image bank with a questionnaire was created, participants grade each image as either accepted or rejected. Fleiss Kappa was used to determine the level of agreement between the radiographers in accepting or rejecting the images in the image bank.

RESULTS

Twenty radiographers with varying years of experience participated in this study. There was fair agreement amongst the radiographers' judgements, k=.277 (95% CI, .277 to .278), p < .005. Individual kappa for the "Accept" and "Reject" categories were both 0.277. There is no significant difference in the agreement level across the junior (k=.278), intermediate (k=.371) and senior (k=.275) radiographers.

CONCLUSION

The result suggests that there is discrepancy in the radiographers' definition of a diagnostic radiograph and this misalignment of radiographers' perception might be one of the underlying causes of high RR.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study has provided the researchers with a better insight on the underlying cause of the department high RR. By calibrating the radiographers' definition of a diagnostic radiograph, it will help realign the radiographer's agreement on when a radiograph should be rejected. This will reduce the overall RR and patient's overall dose. A lower RR translates to a more efficient turnaround time in General Radiography services, ensuring quality service is provided without further strain on our limited resources.

摘要

简介

我们新成立的放射科的整体拒收率(RR)平均为 14%,高于推荐的 8%目标和美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)设定的 10%阈值。一项旨在确定高 RR 潜在原因的分析表明,放射技师可能拒绝了具有诊断价值的图像。放射技师对具有诊断价值的图像的定义缺乏一致性,这可能是整体 RR 较高的一个潜在原因。本研究旨在调查放射技师在定义诊断射线照相时可能存在的差异。

方法

创建了一个包含图像库和问卷的在线调查,参与者对每张图像进行接受或拒绝的评分。Fleiss Kappa 用于确定放射技师在接受或拒绝图像库中的图像时的一致性水平。

结果

20 名具有不同工作年限的放射技师参加了这项研究。放射技师的判断存在公平的一致性,κ=.277(95%CI,.277 至.278),p<.005。“接受”和“拒绝”类别的个体κ均为 0.277。初级(κ=.278)、中级(κ=.371)和高级(κ=.275)放射技师的一致性水平没有显著差异。

结论

结果表明,放射技师对诊断射线照相的定义存在差异,这种放射技师感知的错位可能是高 RR 的潜在原因之一。

实践意义

这项研究为研究人员提供了对该科室高 RR 潜在原因的更好了解。通过校准放射技师对诊断射线照相的定义,可以帮助重新调整放射技师对何时应拒绝射线照相的共识。这将降低整体 RR 和患者的整体剂量。较低的 RR 可缩短常规放射服务的整体周转时间,确保在不进一步增加我们有限资源压力的情况下提供优质服务。

相似文献

1
To reject, or to accept? A study on radiographers' perspectives on diagnostic radiographs.拒绝,还是接受?一项关于放射技师对诊断性 X 光片看法的研究。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;55(4):101720. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101720. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
To keep or reject, that is the question - A survey on radiologists and radiographers' assessments of plain radiography images.保留还是拒收,这是个问题——一项关于放射科医生和放射技师对普通X线摄影图像评估的调查。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Feb;27(1):115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
The assessment of image quality and diagnostic value in X-ray images: a survey on radiographers' reasons for rejecting images.X射线图像的图像质量评估与诊断价值:关于放射技师拒收图像原因的调查
Insights Imaging. 2022 Mar 4;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01169-9.
4
The 12-hour shift: radiographers' perspectives and its applicability during a pandemic.12 小时轮班制:放射技师的观点及其在大流行期间的适用性。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 May;27(2):512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
5
Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.将乳腺放射技师的报告用作放射科医生对数字化乳腺摄影中微钙化解读的第二种意见。
Br J Radiol. 2015 Mar;88(1047):20140565. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140565. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
6
Perceptions of radiographers on reporting chest images at Public Hospitals in Malawi.马拉维公立医院放射技师对胸部影像报告的看法。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2025 Jan;56(1):101764. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101764. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
7
Diagnostic radiographers' experience of COVID-19, Gauteng South Africa.南非豪登省放射诊断技师对 COVID-19 的体验。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 May;27(2):346-351. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
The lateral wrist radiograph - To retake or not to retake.腕关节外侧X线片——是否需要重新拍摄
Radiography (Lond). 2023 Jan;29(1):119-123. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
9
Assessment of radiographers' competences from the perspectives of radiographers and radiologists: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania.从放射技师和放射科医生的角度评估放射技师的能力:立陶宛的一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0863-x.
10
Novel training approach to improve a cohort of radiographers' image interpretation skills of trauma chest radiographs.一种新颖的培训方法,可提高一批放射技师对创伤性胸部 X 光片的图像解读技能。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024 Jun;55(2):244-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Feb 29.