Navigated versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Minimum 18 years clinical outcomes and survivorship of the original Cartier design.

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable option of treatment in case of osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular osteonecrosis (AVN) isolated to either the medial or the lateral compartment of the knee. The aim of this study was to retrospectively present clinical outcomes and survivorship at minimum 18 years follow up of a fixed bearing (FB) UKA comparing the results of conventional technique and navigation.

METHODS

Patients treated with a medial FB UKA between June 2003 and December 2006 were retrospectively evaluated. From March 2005 all UKAs were performed using a computer navigation system. Patients were divided into two groups: UKAs assisted by navigation (n-UKAs) versus standard UKAs (s-UKAs). For all patients, at final follow up, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). Survival rate and outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were analyzed in this retrospective evaluation. All UKAs were medial and the tibial component was all polyethylene (AP) in 26 cases and metal backed (MB) in 26. Twenty-six UKAs were implanted with standard technique (AP 10, MB 16) and 26 assisted by a navigation system (AP 16, MB 10). Three patients (5.7%) underwent revision; the average time to revision was 140.7 months (standard deviation 81.2). Average follow up was 216.4 months (standard deviation 10.6). The survivorship of the implant was 94.4% at final follow up. Survivorship and PROMs were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed excellent survivorship and outcomes at long term follow up of the original fixed bearing Cartier designed implant in both groups with equivalent survivorship and PROMs.