Midterm results for revision total knee arthroplasty for component malrotation.

INTRODUCTION

Accurate positioning of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to a satisfactory outcome. Significant malrotation may lead to chronic pain, stiffness, and dysfunction. This study aims to quantify improvements in functional outcomes following revision surgery for malrotation of either one or both components in TKA versus revision for aseptic loosening.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of TKAs that matched and compared the two-year functional outcomes of the malrotation group to a functionally similar aseptic loosening group. Functional outcomes were compared between groups using Short Form (SF-12), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS). Student t-tests and chi-squared or Fisher's tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the patients revised, 24 had malrotation and 57 had aseptic loosening. A total of 16 femoral and 17 tibial components were revised for malrotation. All 16 femoral components were internally malrotated (mean -4.8 ± 4.1 degrees; range, -0.5 to -16.6). Of the tibial components, 15 were internally malrotated, (mean -9.5 ± 6.6 degrees; range, -2.2 to -23.5) and 2 were externally malrotated (mean 4.6 ± 2.1 degrees; range, 3.1 to 6.0). All functional outcome measures significantly improved comparably within both groups preoperatively to 24 months postoperatively. At 24 months, functional outcome measures were comparable between the groups and WOMAC function scores were significantly higher in the malrotation group.

CONCLUSION

Revision TKA for malrotation can yield clinically and statistically significant functional improvements, similar in magnitude to those seen following revision TKA for aseptic loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.