股四头肌腱与腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带的比较:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon graft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

机构信息

Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, United Kingdom; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, United Kingdom; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Coventry, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Knee. 2024 Aug;49:226-240. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.002. Epub 2024 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is most commonly performed with hamstring tendon (HT) or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts, although the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has recently increased in popularity. This systematic review and meta-analysis review compares QT and HT autografts for primary ACLR with a sole focus on randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A prospective protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023427339). The search included MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science until February 2024. Only comparative RCTs were included. The primary outcome was the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score. Secondary outcomes included: other validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), objective strength scores, complications, and return to sport and work.

RESULTS

From 2,609 articles identified, seven were included (n = 474 patients). This meta-analysis did not identify a significant difference in post-operative IKDC scores (5 articles; p = 0.73), Lysholm scores (3 studies; p = 0.80) or Tegner activity scales (2 studies; p = 0.98). There were no differences in graft failure rates (4 studies; p = 0.92) or in overall adverse events (4 studies; p = 0.83) at 24 months post-ACLR as per meta-analysis. Donor site morbidity scores were significantly lower in the QT group (MD -4.67, 95% CI -9.29 to -0.05; 2 studies, 211 patients; p = 0.05, I = 34%).

CONCLUSION

There were no differences between QT and HT in PROMs, graft failure rates or overall complications based on low- to moderate-quality evidence. There may possibly be lower donor site morbidity with the QT autograft, however, the evidence is not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)最常使用腘绳肌腱(HT)或骨-髌腱-骨(BTB)自体移植物进行,尽管股四头肌肌腱(QT)自体移植物的应用最近有所增加。本系统评价和荟萃分析回顾了 QT 和 HT 自体移植物在原发性 ACLR 中的应用,重点关注随机对照试验(RCT)。

方法

前瞻性方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42023427339)上进行了注册。检索包括 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science,截至 2024 年 2 月。仅纳入比较 RCT。主要结局是国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观膝关节评估表评分。次要结局包括:其他经过验证的患者报告结局测量(PROMs)、客观力量评分、并发症以及重返运动和工作。

结果

从 2609 篇文章中,有 7 篇被纳入(n=474 例患者)。本荟萃分析未发现术后 IKDC 评分(5 篇文章;p=0.73)、Lysholm 评分(3 项研究;p=0.80)或 Tegner 活动量表(2 项研究;p=0.98)存在显著差异。在 ACLR 后 24 个月,根据荟萃分析,两组在移植物失败率(4 项研究;p=0.92)或总体不良事件(4 项研究;p=0.83)方面无差异。QT 组的供区发病率评分明显较低(MD-4.67,95%CI-9.29 至-0.05;2 项研究,211 例患者;p=0.05,I=34%)。

结论

基于低到中等质量证据,QT 和 HT 在 PROMs、移植物失败率或总体并发症方面没有差异。QT 自体移植物的供区发病率可能较低,但证据不足以得出明确结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索