Bluhm G
Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1985;699:1-62.
Infection is a major complication of pacemaker treatment. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used in association with pacemaker surgery with conflicting results, and conclusive prospective trials are lacking. This investigation indicated that systemic antibiotic prophylaxis was of benefit when infections occurred frequently. The effect of local antibiotic prophylaxis was comparable with that of systemic prophylaxis at generator replacements. No serious adverse effects of the prophylaxis were noted. However, with modern surgical methods and hygienic principles, antibiotic prophylaxis did not seem to be necessary at implantation of new cardiac pacemakers. Once infection had developed it was difficult to eradicate and serious complications sometimes occurred. Most infections commenced in the pacemaker pocket. A few cases were cured by antibiotic treatment alone but, particularly if the infection spread along the electrode, surgery was strongly needed and in the presence of endocarditis and/or septicemia all foreign material should be removed if possible. The most common causal microorganisms of pacemaker infections were Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Routinely performed pre-, per- and postoperative cultures were of no prognostic value. Persistent use of antibiotics could select for methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, therefore bacteriological monitoring of wound infections was considered important. The dosage schedules used for cloxacillin and flucloxacillin gave satisfactory serum concentrations peroperatively. Local treatment with cloxacillin in the pacemaker pocket peroperatively gave adequate concentrations in tissue fluid from the pocket 24 h after the operation, as did systemic administration of flucloxacillin. The pharmacokinetics of flucloxacillin in these elderly patients differed in some respects from that found in healthy volunteers. Plasma elimination half-life was almost twice as long. Despite the high degree of plasma protein binding, flucloxacillin appeared to pass rapidly and efficiently to extravascular compartments, such as a pacemaker pocket.
感染是起搏器治疗的主要并发症。抗生素预防已与起搏器手术联合使用,结果相互矛盾,且缺乏确凿的前瞻性试验。这项研究表明,当感染频繁发生时,全身抗生素预防是有益的。在更换发生器时,局部抗生素预防的效果与全身预防相当。未观察到预防措施的严重不良反应。然而,采用现代手术方法和卫生原则后,在植入新的心脏起搏器时似乎无需进行抗生素预防。一旦发生感染,很难根除,有时还会出现严重并发症。大多数感染始于起搏器囊袋。少数病例仅通过抗生素治疗即可治愈,但特别是当感染沿电极扩散时,强烈需要进行手术,并且如果存在心内膜炎和/或败血症,应尽可能清除所有异物。起搏器感染最常见的致病微生物是金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌。常规进行的术前、术中和术后培养没有预后价值。持续使用抗生素可能会选择耐甲氧西林的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,因此伤口感染的细菌学监测被认为很重要。氯唑西林和氟氯西林的给药方案在术中产生了令人满意的血清浓度。术中在起搏器囊袋局部使用氯唑西林,术后24小时囊袋组织液中的浓度足够,全身给予氟氯西林时也是如此。氟氯西林在这些老年患者中的药代动力学在某些方面与健康志愿者不同。血浆消除半衰期几乎延长了一倍。尽管氟氯西林与血浆蛋白的结合程度很高,但它似乎能迅速有效地进入血管外腔室,如起搏器囊袋。