文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸联合纳米脂质体伊立替康(FOLFIRINOX)及替吉奥作为吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇二线治疗不可切除胰腺癌的方案。

Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, and S-1 as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.

机构信息

Division of Drug and Diagnostic Development Promotion, Department for the Promotion of Drug and Diagnostic Development, Translational Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 23;14(1):16906. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65689-8.


DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-65689-8
PMID:39043707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11266600/
Abstract

This study aimed to compare second-line treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy. We conducted an integrated analysis of two retrospective studies included 318 patients receiving nanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (NFF) (n = 102), S-1 (n = 57), or FOLFIRINOX (n = 14) as second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS) in the NFF group was 9.08 months, significantly better than S-1 (4.90 months, P = 0.002). FOLFIRINOX had a median OS of 4.77 months, not statistically different from NFF. Subgroup analyses of OS indicated NFF was generally superior, however, a statistical interaction was observed between the treatment regimen in serum Alb < 3.5 g/dL (P = 0.042) and serum CRP ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (P = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.93 months for NFF, significantly better than S-1 (2.53 months, P = 0.024), while FOLFIRINOX had a comparable PFS (3.04 months, P = 0.948). Multivariate analysis identified the serum CRP, serum CA19-9, duration of first-line GnP therapy, and use (yes/no) of S-1 for second-line treatment as independent predictors for OS. This study concludes that second-line NFF therapy demonstrated a more favorable OS compared to S-1 therapy, however, it is still important to consider the patient background characteristics while selecting the most appropriate treatment.

摘要

本研究旨在比较先前接受吉西他滨加 nab-紫杉醇(GnP)治疗的不可切除胰腺癌患者的二线治疗结果。我们对两项回顾性研究进行了综合分析,共纳入 318 例接受纳米脂质体伊立替康+5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸(NFF)(n=102)、替吉奥(S-1)(n=57)或 FOLFIRINOX(n=14)作为二线治疗的患者。NFF 组的中位总生存期(OS)为 9.08 个月,显著优于 S-1 组(4.90 个月,P=0.002)。FOLFIRINOX 的 OS 中位数为 4.77 个月,与 NFF 无统计学差异。OS 的亚组分析表明 NFF 通常更优,但在血清 Alb<3.5 g/dL(P=0.042)和血清 CRP≥0.3 mg/dL(P=0.006)的患者中观察到治疗方案之间存在统计学交互作用。NFF 的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 2.93 个月,显著优于 S-1(2.53 个月,P=0.024),而 FOLFIRINOX 的 PFS 相当(3.04 个月,P=0.948)。多变量分析确定血清 CRP、血清 CA19-9、一线 GnP 治疗持续时间以及二线治疗中是否使用(是/否)S-1 为 OS 的独立预测因素。本研究得出结论,与 S-1 治疗相比,二线 NFF 治疗显示出更有利的 OS,但在选择最合适的治疗方法时,仍需考虑患者的背景特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11266600/008ff05c7c22/41598_2024_65689_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11266600/4122da2913b2/41598_2024_65689_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11266600/eb810ec5c8d1/41598_2024_65689_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11266600/008ff05c7c22/41598_2024_65689_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11266600/4122da2913b2/41598_2024_65689_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11266600/eb810ec5c8d1/41598_2024_65689_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b8/11266600/008ff05c7c22/41598_2024_65689_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, and S-1 as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.

Sci Rep. 2024-7-23

[2]
A phase-I study of second-line S-IROX for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure.

Med Oncol. 2024-7-5

[3]
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021-2

[4]
Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: does sequence matter?

BMC Cancer. 2019-1-8

[5]
Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX for palliative first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score analysis.

Eur J Cancer. 2021-7

[6]
A Chinese Retrospective Multicenter Study of First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Med Sci Monit. 2020-10-26

[7]
Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatology. 2024-6

[8]
Early tumor shrinkage as a prognostic predictor in chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with modified FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination therapy: An exploratory analysis of JCOG1407.

Pancreatology. 2024-9

[9]
Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid as a second-line treatment option in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC Cancer. 2021-11-3

[10]
Three fluoropyrimidine-based regimens in routine clinical practice after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: An AGEO multicenter study.

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Efficacy of second-line treatment for gemcitabine-refractory unresectable pancreatic cancer in a real-world setting.

BMC Cancer. 2025-7-24

本文引用的文献

[1]
C-reactive protein/albumin ratio is the most significant inflammatory marker in unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.

Sci Rep. 2023-5-31

[2]
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2022 from the Japan Pancreas Society: a synopsis.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2023-4

[3]
Treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022-12-5

[4]
Serum levels of IL-6 and CRP can predict the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Front Oncol. 2022-7-29

[5]
Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV versus modified FOLFIRINOX and FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer: A single center retrospective study.

Pancreatology. 2022-9

[6]
Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A post-hoc analysis of the real-world data of a multicenter study (the NAPOLEON study).

J Geriatr Oncol. 2022-1

[7]
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021-4-1

[8]
Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter retrospective study of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG).

ESMO Open. 2021-4

[9]
Efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy and prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer with homologous recombination deficiency: comparative analysis of published clinical studies.

ESMO Open. 2020

[10]
A multicenter propensity score analysis of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from the NAPOLEON study.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2021-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索