Koga Futa, Kawaguchi Yasunori, Shimokawa Mototsugu, Murayama Kenichiro, Nakashita Shunya, Oza Noriko, Ureshino Norio, Takahashi Hirokazu, Ueda Yujiro, Nakazawa Junichi, Komori Azusa, Otsu Satoshi, Arima Shiho, Fukahori Masaru, Makiyama Akitaka, Taguchi Hiroki, Honda Takuya, Shibuki Taro, Nio Kenta, Ide Yasushi, Mizuta Toshihiko, Shirakawa Tsuyoshi, Otsuka Taiga, Mitsugi Kenji
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatology, Saga Medical Center Koseikan, 400 Kase-machi, Saga-shi, Saga 840-8571, Japan; Saga University Graduate School of Medical Science, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga-shi, Saga 849-8501, Japan.
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatology, Saga Medical Center Koseikan, 400 Kase-machi, Saga-shi, Saga 840-8571, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Asakura Medical Association Hospital, 422-1 Raiha, Asakura-shi, Fukuoka 838-0069, Japan.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jan;13(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), especially those ≥75 years old.
This study retrospectively enrolled 153 patients with MPC who received GnP as first-line chemotherapy. Patients ≥75 years old were allocated to the older group, and those <75 years old were assigned to the non-older group. We compared safety, antitumor efficacy, and survival between the two groups. In the older group, prognostic indicators of survival were also assessed.
The pretreatment characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different excluding age, history of malignancy, and C-reactive protein levels. The initial dose and relative dose intensities of GnP were significantly lower in the older group. There were no significant differences in the adverse event and antitumor response rates between the two groups. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 12.0 months, respectively, in the older group, versus 6.0 and 11.1 months, respectively, in the non-older group. In the older group, a Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) of less than 86 was associated with poor prognosis.
GnP exhibited acceptable efficacy and safety in patients ≥75 years old with MPC. GNRI might be helpful for identifying older individuals at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.
本研究旨在探讨吉西他滨联合纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(GnP)治疗老年转移性胰腺癌(MPC)患者,尤其是75岁及以上患者的疗效和安全性。
本研究回顾性纳入153例接受GnP作为一线化疗的MPC患者。75岁及以上患者被分配到老年组,75岁以下患者被分配到非老年组。我们比较了两组之间的安全性、抗肿瘤疗效和生存率。在老年组中,还评估了生存的预后指标。
除年龄、恶性肿瘤病史和C反应蛋白水平外,两组的预处理特征无显著差异。老年组GnP的初始剂量和相对剂量强度显著较低。两组之间的不良事件和抗肿瘤反应率无显著差异。老年组的中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为5.5个月和12.0个月,而非老年组分别为6.0个月和11.1个月。在老年组中,老年营养风险指数(GNRI)低于86与预后不良相关。
GnP在75岁及以上的MPC患者中显示出可接受的疗效和安全性。GNRI可能有助于识别预后不良风险较高的老年人。