• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度人群肩胛骨肩胛极角的形态测量分析。

Morphometric Analysis of Glenopolar Angle of the Scapula in Indian Population.

作者信息

Kumari Neelam, Subhash Abhijeet, Panchal Padamjeet

机构信息

Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Patna, IND.

Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Patna, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 23;16(7):e65189. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65189. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.65189
PMID:39045020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11265257/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The glenopolar angle (GPA), usually ranges from 30° to 45°. GPA measures the tilt of the plane of the glenoid cavity in relation to the axis of the body of the scapula passing from the superior pole of the glenoid cavity to the inferior angle of the scapula. It is essential to assess the results of surgeries for dislocated shoulders. Worse long-term outcomes can arise from glenoid misalignment in scapular neck fractures. When evaluating prognosis and planning therapy for shoulder injuries including scapular fractures, GPA assessment is essential. Still, there is a dearth of data on the normal range of GPA and its contributing elements, which calls for more study. The purpose of this study is to determine typical GPA values by utilizing radiographs and a sizable sample of scapular bone specimens.

METHODS

In this study, the GPA was assessed in 50 chest radiographs of anteroposterior (AP) view and Neer's view of individuals as well as 100 dried scapulae of any gender. The mean GPA obtained using the various methods was then statistically compared.

FINDINGS

All scapulae had an average GPA of 42.6°. Twenty-nine scapulae had GPA observations higher than 45°, with an average of 47.2°. Twenty-seven scapulae had GPA measurements below 40°, averaging 37.3°. Right-sided 62 scapulae with an average GPA of 43.1° were present. Thirty-eight of left-side scapulae had a GPA of 41.7° on average. It was determined that the 1.6° mean difference in GPA between the two groups was not statistically significant. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test verified that the GPA data had a normal distribution. The homogeneity of variances across various measuring techniques was confirmed using Levene's test. The average GPA measured using the dry scapula approach was 42.6°, the average GPA measured using the AP view was 39.8°, and the average GPA measured using the Neer I view was 42.3°. The GPA means from these three approaches differed considerably (p=0.0014) according to a one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Fisher's least significant difference post hoc testing showed that the scapular bone specimens and the Neer I view revealed significantly higher GPA values than AP shoulder radiographs. The GPA values obtained from the osteological group and the Neer I perspective had a mean difference of 0.21°, which was practically identical and suggested that there was no statistically significant difference between these approaches.

IN SUMMARY

In order to diagnose and treat a variety of shoulder joint diseases, this study estimates the normal values of scapular GPA. Furthermore, it offers support for improved implant design in the context of Indian shoulder joint replacement and repair. Using every measurement technique, the GPA values on the right and left sides did not differ significantly. GPA results from various measuring methods varied significantly, which emphasizes the significance of methodological consistency in clinical and research settings.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af44/11265257/a37f2eacd7c3/cureus-0016-00000065189-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af44/11265257/5c4760040f17/cureus-0016-00000065189-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af44/11265257/cbd0374019bb/cureus-0016-00000065189-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af44/11265257/a37f2eacd7c3/cureus-0016-00000065189-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af44/11265257/5c4760040f17/cureus-0016-00000065189-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af44/11265257/cbd0374019bb/cureus-0016-00000065189-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af44/11265257/a37f2eacd7c3/cureus-0016-00000065189-i03.jpg
摘要

背景

肩胛盂极角(GPA)通常在30°至45°之间。GPA测量肩胛盂平面相对于从肩胛盂上极至肩胛下角的肩胛骨干轴线的倾斜度。评估肩关节脱位手术的结果至关重要。肩胛颈骨折时肩胛盂排列不齐可能导致更差的长期预后。在评估包括肩胛骨折在内的肩部损伤的预后和规划治疗方案时,GPA评估至关重要。然而,关于GPA的正常范围及其影响因素的数据仍然匮乏,这需要更多的研究。本研究的目的是利用X线片和大量肩胛骨骼标本确定典型的GPA值。

方法

在本研究中,对50例个体的前后位(AP)胸片和Neer位片以及100具不同性别的干燥肩胛骨进行了GPA评估。然后对使用不同方法获得的平均GPA进行统计学比较。

结果

所有肩胛骨的平均GPA为42.6°。29具肩胛骨的GPA观察值高于45°,平均为47.2°。27具肩胛骨的GPA测量值低于40°,平均为?37.3°。右侧有62具肩胛骨,平均GPA为43.1°。左侧38具肩胛骨的GPA平均为41.7°。两组之间GPA的平均差异1.6°无统计学意义。Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验证实GPA数据呈正态分布。使用Levene检验确认了不同测量技术之间方差的齐性。使用干燥肩胛骨方法测量的平均GPA为42.6°,使用AP位片测量的平均GPA为39.8°,使用Neer I位片测量的平均GPA为42.3°。根据单因素方差分析(ANOVA),这三种方法的GPA均值差异显著(p = 0.0014)。Fisher最小显著差异事后检验表明,肩胛骨骼标本和Neer I位片显示的GPA值明显高于AP位肩部X线片。从骨骼学组和Neer I位获得的GPA值平均差异为0.21°,几乎相同,表明这些方法之间无统计学显著差异。

总结

为了诊断和治疗各种肩关节疾病,本研究估计了肩胛GPA的正常值。此外,它为印度肩关节置换和修复中改进植入物设计提供了支持。使用每种测量技术,左右两侧的GPA值无显著差异。不同测量方法的GPA结果差异显著,这强调了临床和研究环境中方法一致性的重要性。

相似文献

1
Morphometric Analysis of Glenopolar Angle of the Scapula in Indian Population.印度人群肩胛骨肩胛极角的形态测量分析。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 23;16(7):e65189. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65189. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
The scapular glenopolar angle: standard values and side differences.肩胛盂极角:标准值及左右侧差异
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Nov;43(11):1583-7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1977-4. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
3
The assessment of scapular radiographs: analysis of anteroposterior radiographs of the shoulder and the effect of rotational offset on the glenopolar angle.肩胛骨 X 光片评估:肩部前后位 X 光片分析及旋转偏移对肩胛盂顶角的影响。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1114-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.30631.
4
Comparison of measurements of the glenopolar angle in 3D CT reconstructions of the scapula and 2D plain radiographic views.肩胛骨三维CT重建与二维X线平片测量盂极角的比较。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1510-1516. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.37800.
5
Is radiograph glenopolar angle accurate for extraarticular scapular neck fractures?X线片的肩胛盂极角对于关节外肩胛颈骨折是否准确?
Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2772-2776. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
Does the position of the scapula in relation to the glenopolar angle change the preferred treatment of extra-articular fractures?肩胛骨相对于肩胛盂极角的位置是否会改变关节外骨折的首选治疗方法?
Injury. 2017 Oct;48 Suppl 4:S21-S26. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30771-4.
7
Investigation of Morphological and Biomechanical Properties of the Scapula for Shoulder Joint.肩关节肩胛骨的形态学和生物力学特性研究
Medeni Med J. 2023 Sep 28;38(3):159-166. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.15483.
8
Scapular neck fracture--the influence of permanent malalignment of the glenoid neck on clinical outcome.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001 Jun;121(6):313-6. doi: 10.1007/s004020000224.
9
[Dynamic radiographic evaluation of the antero-inferior gleno-humeral ligament].[肩肱关节前下韧带的动态放射学评估]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 May;89(3):201-9.
10
Stability, deformity, and fixation of the floating shoulder: a cadaveric biomechanical study.漂浮肩的稳定性、畸形和固定:尸体生物力学研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Mar;32(3):519-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.021. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of measurements of the glenopolar angle in 3D CT reconstructions of the scapula and 2D plain radiographic views.肩胛骨三维CT重建与二维X线平片测量盂极角的比较。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1510-1516. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.37800.
2
Is radiograph glenopolar angle accurate for extraarticular scapular neck fractures?X线片的肩胛盂极角对于关节外肩胛颈骨折是否准确?
Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2772-2776. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Functional Outcomes After Operative Management of Extra-Articular Glenoid Neck and Scapular Body Fractures.
关节外肩胛盂颈部和肩胛体骨折手术治疗后的功能结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 5;98(19):1623-1630. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01224.
4
Clinical outcome and radiographic change of ipsilateral scapular neck and clavicular shaft fracture: comparison of operation and conservative treatment.同侧肩胛颈与锁骨骨干骨折的临床疗效及影像学改变:手术治疗与保守治疗的比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jan 28;10:9. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0141-0.
5
The scapular glenopolar angle: standard values and side differences.肩胛盂极角:标准值及左右侧差异
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Nov;43(11):1583-7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1977-4. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
6
The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on body involvement.AO 基金会和骨科创伤协会 (AO/OTA)肩胛骨骨折分类系统:关注身体受累情况。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.040. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
7
The assessment of scapular radiographs: analysis of anteroposterior radiographs of the shoulder and the effect of rotational offset on the glenopolar angle.肩胛骨 X 光片评估:肩部前后位 X 光片分析及旋转偏移对肩胛盂顶角的影响。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Aug;95-B(8):1114-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.30631.
8
The floating shoulder—-clinical and radiological results after intramedullary stabilization of the clavicle in cases with minor displacement of the scapular neck fracture.漂浮肩——锁骨骨折伴肩胛颈骨块轻微移位患者髓内固定后的临床和影像学结果
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):E8-13. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e31822ad58a.
9
Development and validation of the new international classification for scapula fractures.肩胛骨骨折新国际分类的制定与验证。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun;26(6):364-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182382625.
10
Analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced scapular fractures.手术与非手术治疗移位肩胛骨折的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3379-89. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2016-6.