Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xin Si Road, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Department of Disease Prevention and Health Care, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5228-5238. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11017-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) are minimally invasive, effective, and safe in treating esophageal-fundic variceal bleeding with portal hypertension (PHT). The study aimed to assess the learning curve of LSED by cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis. The 10-year follow-up data for LSED and open surgery were also examined.
Five hundred and ninety-four patients were retrospectively analyzed. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, open operation conversion, and postoperative complications were selected as the evaluation indicators of surgical ability. The learning curve of LESD was assessed by the CUSUM approach. Patient features, perioperative indices, and 10-year follow-up data were examined.
Totally 236 patients underwent open surgery, and 358 underwent LSED. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The LSED patients experienced less intraoperative blood loss, fewer complications, and faster recovery compared to the open surgery cohort. The learning curve of LESD was maximal for a case number of 50. Preoperative general characteristics were comparable for both stages. But the skilled stage had decreased operation time, reduced blood loss, less postoperative complications, and better recovery compared to the learning stage. The LSED group had higher recurrent hemorrhage-free survival rate and increased overall survival in comparison with cases administered open surgery in the 10-year follow-up. Free-liver cancer rates were similar between two groups.
About 50 cases are needed to master the LSED procedure. Compared to open surgery, LSED is a safer, feasible, and safe procedure for PHT patients, correlating with decreased rebleeding rate and better overall survival.
腹腔镜脾切除术和食管胃底静脉离断术(LSED)在治疗门静脉高压(PHT)所致食管胃底静脉曲张出血方面具有微创、有效且安全的特点。本研究旨在通过累积和(CUSUM)分析评估 LSED 的学习曲线。还对 LSED 和开放手术的 10 年随访数据进行了检查。
回顾性分析了 594 例患者。选择手术时间、术中出血量、中转开腹手术和术后并发症作为手术能力的评估指标。采用 CUSUM 方法评估 LESD 的学习曲线。检查患者特征、围手术期指标和 10 年随访数据。
共有 236 例患者接受了开放手术,358 例患者接受了 LSED。两组患者的特征相似。与开放手术组相比,LSED 组患者术中出血量更少,并发症更少,恢复更快。LSED 的学习曲线在病例数达到 50 时达到最大值。两个阶段的术前一般特征相似。但熟练阶段的手术时间缩短,出血量减少,术后并发症减少,恢复情况更好。与接受开放手术的病例相比,LSED 组在 10 年随访中具有更高的无复发出血生存率和更高的总生存率。两组的无肝癌生存率相似。
大约需要 50 例才能掌握 LSED 手术。与开放手术相比,LSED 是一种更安全、可行的治疗 PHT 患者的方法,与降低再出血率和更好的总体生存率相关。