Department of Pediatrics, Division of Autism and Related Disabilities, Emory School of Medicine, 1920 Briarcliff Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, Georgia.
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Nov;51(6):1020-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01399-7. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
In the autism field, there is increasing interest in translating evidence-based interventions (EBIs) into systems that serve young autistic children and their families. Public Early Intervention systems have been a focal point of research-based implementation efforts given that these systems are federally mandated to provide services to children birth to three years of age with developmental delays under Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Although a growing number of research studies are now training Early Intervention providers to deliver autism EBIs, this work has been conducted on a relatively small scale and has only just begun to consider the alignment of these models with Early Intervention systems and whether sufficient infrastructure exists to scale up these training efforts and to sustain their public health impact. This commentary aims to address this gap by reviewing factors that have been found to uniformly impact the scale-up of EBIs across diverse public systems (Fagan 20, 1147-1168, 2019), and to extend this framework to the implementation of EBIs within public Early Intervention systems. These factors include developer and funder capacity, the public's awareness of and support for EBIs, the system's leadership support for EBI use, the capacity for community engagement in implementation efforts, the availability of a skilled workforce capable of delivering EBIs, and the capacity for data monitoring and quality improvement. This commentary discusses how these factors may specifically impact the scale-up of autism EBIs within EI systems to support toddlers and young, autistic children, and implications for autism researchers.
在自闭症领域,越来越多的人关注将循证干预措施 (EBIs) 转化为为自闭症儿童及其家庭服务的系统。鉴于这些系统根据《残疾人教育法》第 C 部分有义务为有发育迟缓的 0-3 岁儿童提供服务,公共早期干预系统一直是基于研究的实施工作的重点。尽管现在越来越多的研究正在培训早期干预提供者提供自闭症 EBI,但这项工作的规模相对较小,并且才刚刚开始考虑这些模式与早期干预系统的一致性,以及是否存在足够的基础设施来扩大这些培训工作的规模并维持其公共卫生影响。本评论旨在通过回顾已发现的在不同公共系统中普遍影响 EBI 扩大的因素(Fagan 20, 1147-1168, 2019)来解决这一差距,并将这一框架扩展到公共早期干预系统中 EBI 的实施。这些因素包括开发者和资助者的能力、公众对 EBI 的认识和支持、系统对 EBI 使用的领导支持、社区参与实施工作的能力、能够提供 EBI 的熟练劳动力的可用性,以及数据监测和质量改进的能力。本评论讨论了这些因素如何特别影响自闭症 EBI 在 EI 系统中的扩大,以支持幼儿和年幼的自闭症儿童,以及对自闭症研究人员的影响。