Suppr超能文献

评估缓释地塞米松植入剂作为角膜移植术后炎症和疼痛辅助治疗的效果。

Evaluating a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Insert as Adjunctive Therapy for Inflammation and Pain Post-Corneal Transplantation.

作者信息

Alsetri Hasan, Fram Nicole, Shiler Orly

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.

Advanced Vision Care, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 16;18:2083-2091. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S466118. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficiency and safety of an intracanalicular dexamethasone insert (Dextenza, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc) supplemented with a reduced-frequency topical drop regimen in mitigating pain and inflammation post-penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), compared to standard topical corticosteroid therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eyes were categorized within the DSEK, DMEK, or PKP groups based on ocular characteristics and surgical indications. Randomized in a 1:1 ratio, the intervention group received Dextenza alongside a lowered drop frequency, while the control group followed a conventional drop protocol with no Dextenza. Primary outcomes included average pain scores and absence of anterior chamber cell and flare. Secondary outcomes included delayed re-epithelialization, corneal rejection episodes, instances of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation >10mmHg above baseline, cystoid macular edema (CME) occurrence, and the necessity for steroid rescue.

RESULTS

The study included 30 eyes (10 PKP, 10 DSEK, 10 DMEK). Mean pain scores (0-100 scale; (0-39 = mild pain, 40-69 = moderate pain, 70-100 = severe pain) in the Dextenza group were 3.6 (PKP), 12 (DSEK), 8 (DMEK), compared to 1.2 (PKP), 0 (DSEK), and 4 (DMEK) in controls. PKP control (n=5): 1 delayed re-epithelialization, 1 IOP elevation, 2 CME. DSEK control (n=5): 1 corneal rejection, 1 IOP elevation, 1 CME. DMEK control (n=5): 1 IOP elevation, 1 CME. DMEK Dextenza (n=5): 1 delayed re-epithelialization, 1 CME. No cases required steroid rescue, and no cell or flare was observed one-week post-surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in pain, delayed re-epithelialization, IOP elevation, corneal rejection, or CME between the Dextenza and control groups regardless of the type of corneal transplantation performed.

CONCLUSION

Dextenza, when combined with a lower-frequency drop regimen, demonstrates a safety profile comparable to that of a traditional higher-frequency drop protocol in terms of pain management and the adverse events explored in this study, potentially enhancing postoperative drop adherence.

摘要

目的

评估与标准局部用皮质类固醇疗法相比,管内植入地塞米松(Dextenza,Ocular Therapeutix公司)并辅以减少用药频率的局部滴眼方案在减轻穿透性角膜移植术(PKP)、后弹力层剥除内皮角膜移植术(DSEK)和后弹力层内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)后疼痛和炎症方面的有效性和安全性。

患者与方法

根据眼部特征和手术指征,将眼睛分为DSEK、DMEK或PKP组。按1:1比例随机分组,干预组接受Dextenza并降低滴眼频率,而对照组遵循无Dextenza的传统滴眼方案。主要结局包括平均疼痛评分以及无前房细胞和房水闪辉。次要结局包括上皮化延迟、角膜排斥反应、眼压(IOP)升高超过基线水平10mmHg以上的情况、黄斑囊样水肿(CME)的发生以及类固醇挽救的必要性。

结果

该研究纳入30只眼(10只PKP、10只DSEK、10只DMEK)。Dextenza组的平均疼痛评分(0 - 100分制;(0 - 39 = 轻度疼痛,40 - 69 = 中度疼痛,70 - 100 = 重度疼痛)在PKP中为3.6分,DSEK中为12分,DMEK中为8分,而对照组在PKP中为1.2分,DSEK中为0分,DMEK中为4分。PKP对照组(n = 5):1例上皮化延迟,1例眼压升高,2例CME。DSEK对照组(n = 5):1例角膜排斥反应,1例眼压升高,1例CME。DMEK对照组(n = 5):1例眼压升高,1例CME。DMEK的Dextenza组(n = 5):1例上皮化延迟,1例CME。无病例需要类固醇挽救,术后一周未观察到细胞或房水闪辉。无论进行何种类型的角膜移植,Dextenza组和对照组在疼痛、上皮化延迟、眼压升高、角膜排斥反应或CME方面均无统计学显著差异。

结论

Dextenza与较低频率的滴眼方案联合使用时,在疼痛管理和本研究探讨的不良事件方面显示出与传统较高频率滴眼方案相当的安全性,可能提高术后滴眼依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a982/11268718/e2b881c5e9ca/OPTH-18-2083-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验