• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年和青年癌症患者的邻里级健康负担的社会决定因素及其对总生存的影响。

Neighborhood-level social determinants of health burden among adolescent and young adult cancer patients and impact on overall survival.

机构信息

Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jul 1;8(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae062.

DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkae062
PMID:39051679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11337577/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation has been linked to adverse health outcomes, yet it is unclear whether neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH) measures affect overall survival in adolescent and young adult patients with cancer.

METHODS

This study used a diverse cohort of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer (N = 10 261) seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Zip codes were linked to Area Deprivation Index (ADI) values, a validated neighborhood-level SDOH measure, with higher ADI values representing worse SDOH.

RESULTS

ADI was statistically significantly worse (P < .050) for Black (61.7) and Hispanic (65.3) patients than for White patients (51.2). Analysis of ADI by cancer type showed statistically significant differences, mainly driven by worse ADI in patients with cervical cancer (62.3) than with other cancers. In multivariable models including sex, age at diagnosis, cancer diagnosis, and race and ethnicity, risk of shorter survival for people residing in neighborhoods with the least favorable ADI quartile was greater than for individuals in the most favorable ADI quartile (hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval = 1.00 to 1.19, P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Adolescent and young adult patients with cancer and the worst ADI values experienced a nearly 10% increase in risk of dying than patients with more favorable ADI values. This effect was strongest among White adolescent and young adult survivors. Although the magnitude of the effect of ADI on survival was moderate, the presence of a relationship between neighborhood-level SDOH and survival among patients who received care at a tertiary cancer center suggests that ADI is a meaningful predictor of survival. These findings provide intriguing evidence for potential interventions aimed at supporting adolescent and young adult patients with cancer from disadvantaged neighborhoods.

摘要

背景

社区社会经济剥夺与不良健康结果相关,但尚不清楚社区层面的健康社会决定因素(SDOH)指标是否会影响青少年和年轻成年癌症患者的总体生存。

方法

本研究使用了 MD 安德森癌症中心收治的不同种族青少年和年轻成年癌症患者的多样化队列(N=10261)。邮政编码与区域剥夺指数(ADI)值相关联,ADI 是一种经过验证的社区层面 SDOH 指标,ADI 值越高表示 SDOH 越差。

结果

与白人患者(51.2)相比,黑人(61.7)和西班牙裔(65.3)患者的 ADI 明显更差(P<.050)。按癌症类型分析 ADI 时,发现存在统计学显著差异,主要是由于宫颈癌患者(62.3)的 ADI 更差。在包括性别、诊断时年龄、癌症诊断以及种族和民族的多变量模型中,居住在 ADI 最不利四分位数的街区的人群比居住在 ADI 最有利四分位数的人群的生存风险更高(风险比=1.09,95%置信区间=1.00 至 1.19,P=.043)。

结论

患有癌症且 ADI 值最差的青少年和年轻成年患者的死亡风险比 ADI 值更有利的患者增加近 10%。这种影响在白人青少年和年轻成年幸存者中最强。尽管 ADI 对生存的影响幅度适中,但在接受三级癌症中心治疗的患者中,社区层面的 SDOH 与生存之间存在关系,这表明 ADI 是生存的一个有意义的预测指标。这些发现为针对来自贫困社区的青少年和年轻成年癌症患者的潜在干预措施提供了有趣的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/11337577/2e0a7d0e3867/pkae062f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/11337577/09cb9cf044f6/pkae062f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/11337577/2e0a7d0e3867/pkae062f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/11337577/09cb9cf044f6/pkae062f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/11337577/2e0a7d0e3867/pkae062f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Neighborhood-level social determinants of health burden among adolescent and young adult cancer patients and impact on overall survival.青少年和青年癌症患者的邻里级健康负担的社会决定因素及其对总生存的影响。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jul 1;8(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae062.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Examining the Relationship Between Racial, Ethnic, and Economic Residential Segregation and Cigarette Smoking Among a Nationally Representative Sample of Young Adults.在全国代表性的年轻成年人样本中,研究种族、族裔和经济居住隔离与吸烟之间的关系。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 May 22;27(6):1016-1024. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae277.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
9
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.接种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗以预防宫颈癌及其癌前病变。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3.
10
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived Barriers and Use of Evidence-Based Practices for Adolescent HPV Vaccination among East Texas Providers.东德克萨斯州医疗服务提供者对青少年人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的认知障碍及循证实践应用情况
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 25;11(4):728. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040728.
2
Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗犹豫在美国。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2023 Apr;70(2):211-226. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.11.002.
3
Risk of early death in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a population-based study.癌症青少年和年轻成人的早期死亡风险:一项基于人群的研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Apr 11;115(4):447-455. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac206.
4
Adolescent and young adult cancers: unmet needs and closing the gaps.青少年和青年癌症:未满足的需求与弥合差距
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2023 Feb 1;35(1):84-90. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001200. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Cardiovascular disease in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: Impact of sociodemographic and modifiable risk factors.青少年和青年癌症幸存者的心血管疾病:社会人口学和可改变风险因素的影响
Cancer. 2023 Feb 1;129(3):450-460. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34505. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Disparities in Time to Treatment for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌治疗时间的差异。
Anticancer Res. 2022 Dec;42(12):5813-5818. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16088.
7
Population-Based Impact of Rurality and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage on Pediatric Cancer Mortality in Washington State.基于人群的农村和邻里社会经济劣势对华盛顿州儿科癌症死亡率的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jan 9;32(1):141-148. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0897.
8
Association of Race and Area Deprivation With Breast Cancer Survival Among Black and White Women in the State of Georgia.佐治亚州黑人和白人女性的种族和地区贫困程度与乳腺癌生存状况的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38183.
9
Social Determinants of Health-An Approach Taken at CDC.健康的社会决定因素——美国疾病控制与预防中心采取的一种方法
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(6):589-594. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001626. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
10
County-Level Social Vulnerability and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US, 2018.美国 2018 年县级社会脆弱性与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33429.